Comparison Overview

Bank Mega

VS

China CITIC Bank

Bank Mega

Menara Bank Mega, Jl. Kapt Tendean 12 - 14A, Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, ID, 12790
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Perjalanan Bank Mega berawal pada tahun 1969, dengan nama PT Bank Karman di Surabaya. Kemudian bertransformasi menjadi Mega Bank pada tahun 1992, dan berpindah lokasi ke Jakarta. Pada tahun 1996, Chairul Tanjung dengan PARA GROUP, yang kini dikenal dengan CT Corpora, mengambil alih dan membuat gebrakan dengan menghadirkan logo baru untuk mengukuhkan Mega Bank sebagai lembaga keuangan kepercayaan masyarakat. Tahun 2000 menjadi tahun yang penting, kala Mega Bank mengganti nama menjadi PT Bank Mega Tbk dan melaksanakan Initial Public Offering dan pencatatan di BEJ dan BES. Hingga kini, PT Bank Mega Tbk berpegang pada azas profesionalisme, keterbukaan dan kehati-hatian dengan struktur permodalan yang kuat serta produk dan fasilitas perbankan terkini. Mengusung visi untuk menjadi Bank Kebanggaan Indonesia, Bank Mega berkomitmen dalam mewujudkan hubungan baik yang berkesinambungan dengan nasabah, melalui layanan perbankan inovatif dan sinergi dengan didukung oleh ekosistem yang terintegrasi, sumber daya manusia yang profesional serta kemampuan kinerja organisasi terbaik untuk memberikan nilai tambah yang tinggi bagi seluruh stakeholder. Bank Mega menjunjung tinggi Dynamics, Entrepreneurship, Trust, Ethics, Commitment, Synergy sebagai nilai dan budaya perusahaan yang dibangun dalam setiap lapis organisasi perusahaan sehingga tercipta lingkungan kerja yang harmonis, dinamis, dan nyaman. Pencapaian terbaru Bank Mega: - Investortrust The Best Bank 2024 - Kategori KBMI 3 - 2024 Stellar Workplace Recognition in Employee Commitment - 2024 Stellar Workplace Recognition in Employee Satisfaction - LPS Award 2023 - Bank Terbaik Versi Pelaporan SCV - CNBC Indonesia Awards 2022 - The Best Performing Big Bank - CNBC Indonesia - Best of The Best Awards 2022 - The Best 50 Public Listed Companies 2022 - Forbes Indonesia - Tempo Financial Award - The Best Bank in Financial Resilience Kategori Bank Umum Konvensional (KBMI 3 dan 4) dan masih banyak lagi pencapaian Bank Mega lainnya...

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,167
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

China CITIC Bank

Beijing, 100101, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 800 and 849

Overview Thinking on the corporate banking of small and medium sized commercial banks • Ranked the 99th among 2008 Global Top 500 Financial Brands • Chen Xiaoxian, the Bank’s President, was granted “Top 10 Financial Figures” Award in the fourth consecutive year • Selection activity about the ranking list of “50 Most Influential Events of Financial Reform and Opening-up in China and 2008 China's Best Financial Institutions” • Best Corporate Banking Business Award among Top 10 Outstanding Commercial Banks in Asia • Global Times 2008 Most Popular Retail Banks among Readers • China Business News 2008 Development Strategy Award Corporate Financial Service Brand of the Year Retail Financial Service Brand of the Year President Chen Xiaoxian was awarded “Financier of the Year 2008” • Chinese Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Most Trusted Bank 2008 by Chinese CFO • British Magazine “The Banker” Ranked the 77th among the Top 1000 World Banks • British Financial Times Ranked the 260th among 2008 Global Top 500 Enterprises in Market Value • 21st Century Business Herald China’s Most Potential Private Banks of the Year • ASIA MONEY Best Domestic Providers of FX Services Best For Overall FX Services Best Domestic Banks for Cash Management in China • The Asian Banker Journal Best Wealth Management Award • Euromoney Best Private Banks of Stock Portfolio Management in China • America Annual Call Centre Exhibition World’s Best Call Center

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-bank-mega-tbk..jpeg
Bank Mega
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinaciticbank.jpeg
China CITIC Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bank Mega
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
China CITIC Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank Mega in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China CITIC Bank in 2025.

Incident History — Bank Mega (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bank Mega cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — China CITIC Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China CITIC Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-bank-mega-tbk..jpeg
Bank Mega
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinaciticbank.jpeg
China CITIC Bank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

China CITIC Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bank Mega company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, China CITIC Bank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Bank Mega company.

In the current year, China CITIC Bank company and Bank Mega company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither China CITIC Bank company nor Bank Mega company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither China CITIC Bank company nor Bank Mega company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither China CITIC Bank company nor Bank Mega company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Bank Mega company nor China CITIC Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bank Mega nor China CITIC Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Bank Mega company nor China CITIC Bank company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bank Mega company employs more people globally than China CITIC Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Bank Mega nor China CITIC Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bank Mega nor China CITIC Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bank Mega nor China CITIC Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bank Mega nor China CITIC Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bank Mega nor China CITIC Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bank Mega nor China CITIC Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H