Comparison Overview

CIMB Niaga

VS

Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI)

CIMB Niaga

Graha CIMB Niaga, Jakarta, DKI, 12190, ID
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

CIMB Niaga was established as Bank Niaga in 1955. CIMB Group holds around 97.9% of the stakes in CIMB Niaga (including PT Commerce Kapital 1.02%). The Bank offers a comprehensive suite of both conventional and Islamic banking products and services, through an expanding delivery channel network of 919 network channels all over Indonesia as at 30 June 2015, including 563 branches, 271 Mikro Laju units (excluding 18 co-located), 65 cash/payment points (including 21 Digital Lounges) and 20 mobile branches. CIMB Niaga has 15,078 employees as at 30 June 2015. CIMB Niaga consistently continue to innovate in the midst of competitive market. CIMB Niaga put customer centric approach to strengthen its positioning in Indonesia banking industry. And for that reason, CIMB Niaga introduced the new brand positioning ‘Inovasi dari Hati’ at the beginning of the year 2015. The new brand positioning also encourages people to share high growth and take advantage of all the potential that the South-East Asia regions bring – in line with CIMB Group’s brand positioning: “ASEAN for You”. CIMB Group is Malaysia’s second largest financial services provider and one of ASEAN’s leading universal banking groups. It offers consumer banking, investment banking, Islamic banking, asset management and insurance products and services. Headquartered in Kuala Lumpur, the Group is now present in 9 out of 10 ASEAN nations (Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Singapore, Cambodia, Brunei, Vietnam, Myanmar and Laos). Beyond ASEAN, the Group has market presence in China, Hong Kong, Bahrain, India, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, the US, UK and Korea. CIMB Group is listed on the Malaysian stock exchange via CIMB Group Holdings Berhad. As at 30 June 2015, the Group had a market capitalization of USD46.4 billion and about 44,000 employees located in 17 countries.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 13,451
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI)

Ayala North Exchange Tower 1, 6796 Ayala Avenue cor. Salcedo St., Legazpi Village, Makati City , Metro Manila, PH, 1229
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1851, the Bank of the Philippine Islands is the first bank in the Philippines and in Southeast Asia. Together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, BPI, a universal bank, offers a wide range of financial products and services that serve both retail and corporate clients. Get ready to start a bright future with us. We have diverse talents and expertise — from individuals who keep up with the gyrations of the financial markets, to those who collect and analyze data, to people who help clients with their simple or complex financial needs and even tech-savvy millennials with a knack for creating apps. Our Mission We are your trusted financial adviser, nurturing your future and making life easier Our Vision Building a better Philippines -- one family, one community at a time Our Values We are Nurturing. We act with Integrity. We are Customer Obsessed. We act with Excellence. WHY CHOOSE BPI 1. Rich heritage in banking and finance - BPI continues to pave the way for the Philippine banking and financial industry, supporting economic growth and nation-building. 2. Reputation for financial prudence and client trust - BPI is widely known and respected for its financial expertise and prudence, client trust, and industry leadership. 3. Culture of excellence - BPI has a culture of excellence, where employees feel that they are working on something meaningful, significant and purpose-driven, towards a common goal and purpose.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 14,776
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt--bank-cimb-niaga-tbk.jpeg
CIMB Niaga
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-of-the-philippine-islands.jpeg
Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CIMB Niaga
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIMB Niaga in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) in 2025.

Incident History — CIMB Niaga (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIMB Niaga cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt--bank-cimb-niaga-tbk.jpeg
CIMB Niaga
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-of-the-philippine-islands.jpeg
Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both CIMB Niaga company and Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CIMB Niaga company.

In the current year, Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) company and CIMB Niaga company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) company nor CIMB Niaga company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) company nor CIMB Niaga company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) company nor CIMB Niaga company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CIMB Niaga company nor Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CIMB Niaga nor Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CIMB Niaga company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) company.

Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) company employs more people globally than CIMB Niaga company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither CIMB Niaga nor Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CIMB Niaga nor Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CIMB Niaga nor Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CIMB Niaga nor Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CIMB Niaga nor Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CIMB Niaga nor Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H