Comparison Overview

PSYTREC

VS

Center for Optimal Living

PSYTREC

Amersfoortseweg 10a, Zeist, 3705 GJ, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://psytrec.nl/

PSYTREC | Psychotrauma Expertise Centrum is een innovatieve gespecialiseerde GGZ-instelling, erkend door het ministerie van VWS. Voor mensen met ernstige, complexe PTSS bieden wij een een zeer intensief, kortdurend behandelprogramma, ontwikkeld door professor dr. Ad de Jongh (Universiteit van Amsterdam, University of Worcester) en professor dr. Agnes van Minnen (Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen). De PTSS richtlijnbehandelingen EMDR en Exposure zijn samen met Sport & Beweging en Psycho-educatie geïntegreerd in een samenhangend en bewezen effectief behandelprogramma. De behandelresultaten zijn zeer goed, zie hiervoor onze website. Wij hebben twee behandelcentra, een in Zeist en een in Weert.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 157
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Center for Optimal Living

370 Lexington Ave, New York, 10017, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 800 and 849
http://Centerforoptimalliving.com

The Center for Optimal Living is a treatment and training center for addiction and mental health issues. Our approach utilizes Integrative Harm Reduction Psychotherapy (IHRP), developed by our founder and director, Dr. Andrew Tatarsky. The Center for Optimal Living, with its team of twelve dedicated clinicians, is the only private treatment center that offers this unique form of therapy. The Center for Optimal Living was founded in 2011 in New York City. The cornerstone of IHRP is a collaborative, therapeutic relationship that “starts where the person is.” We specialize in helping people figure out whether moderate, less harmful substance use, or abstinence is best suited for them. We tailor our services to help our clients pursue their chosen goal. The Center for Optimal Living also provides trainings, supervision, and consultation to professionals and organizations. We are actively involved in advocacy efforts to support the needs of those impacted by mental health issues and substance misuse. Our Approach Addiction treatment has long been dominated by approaches that require complete abstinence. We recognize that not everyone is ready to commit to abstinence at the onset of treatment and we specialize in engaging people to reduce risk and make positive changes based on where they are ready to begin. By expanding the focus of treatment to include risk reduction and moderation, our aim is to reduce stigma surrounding addiction treatment. Our approach utilizes harm reduction which aims to reduce the risks associated with drug and alcohol use in a collaborative and empowering way. Abstinence, moderation, and safe use practices are embraced within the umbrella of harm reduction. We understand how shame and stigma may prevent people from seeking help and realize how important the therapeutic relationship is. We view that as a critical foundation of our work and strive to create a safe and non-judgmental environment where our clients can begin to make positive and lasting changes.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psytrec.jpeg
PSYTREC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-optimal-living.jpeg
Center for Optimal Living
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PSYTREC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Optimal Living
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PSYTREC in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Optimal Living in 2026.

Incident History — PSYTREC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PSYTREC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Optimal Living (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Optimal Living cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psytrec.jpeg
PSYTREC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-optimal-living.jpeg
Center for Optimal Living
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Optimal Living company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PSYTREC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Optimal Living company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PSYTREC company.

In the current year, Center for Optimal Living company and PSYTREC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Optimal Living company nor PSYTREC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Optimal Living company nor PSYTREC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Optimal Living company nor PSYTREC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PSYTREC company nor Center for Optimal Living company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PSYTREC nor Center for Optimal Living holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PSYTREC company nor Center for Optimal Living company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PSYTREC company employs more people globally than Center for Optimal Living company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither PSYTREC nor Center for Optimal Living holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PSYTREC nor Center for Optimal Living holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PSYTREC nor Center for Optimal Living holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PSYTREC nor Center for Optimal Living holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PSYTREC nor Center for Optimal Living holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PSYTREC nor Center for Optimal Living holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References