Comparison Overview

Psylo Graphics, Inc

VS

Brandt Affixing, Inc.

Psylo Graphics, Inc

undefined, undefined, undefined, 92056, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.psylographics.com

Psylo Graphics is a high-end screen printing studio founded in 2008 by a group of graphic designers, printers and entrepreneurs that have been working in the industry for more than 25 years. Our convenient location, solid public relations, good work and customer service placed us quickly as a very reliable alternative for all companies and individuals looking for advanced screen printing solutions in Southern California and abroad. At Psylo Graphics we can help you through all the steps required to achieve the best results for your promotional products or clothing line. From selecting and providing the right blanks, developing or enhancing your designs, screen printing with the best inks for your project to finishing your products with all the necessary embelishments, labels and packaging so you can have them ready for retail sales. We offer a wide range of services that makes it easy for you or your company to order everything you need in the same place and adjust to your budget.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Brandt Affixing, Inc.

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.brandtaffixing.com

We are a provide of unique finishing services to the printing, graphic arts, and direct mail trade. We offer flexo printing - up to 8 colors, including 4 color process on a wide variety of products including membership cards, labels and magnets. We offer custom affixing / attaching to virtually any type of document. We also offer a full line of digital ready documents for the growing digital print market. And we now offer fulfillment, pick and pack distribution and inventory management through our newly created fulfillment division: BAI Solutions.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psylo-graphics-inc.jpeg
Psylo Graphics, Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandt-affixing-inc..jpeg
Brandt Affixing, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Psylo Graphics, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brandt Affixing, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Psylo Graphics, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brandt Affixing, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Psylo Graphics, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Psylo Graphics, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brandt Affixing, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brandt Affixing, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psylo-graphics-inc.jpeg
Psylo Graphics, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brandt-affixing-inc..jpeg
Brandt Affixing, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Psylo Graphics, Inc company and Brandt Affixing, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Brandt Affixing, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Psylo Graphics, Inc company.

In the current year, Brandt Affixing, Inc. company and Psylo Graphics, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brandt Affixing, Inc. company nor Psylo Graphics, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brandt Affixing, Inc. company nor Psylo Graphics, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brandt Affixing, Inc. company nor Psylo Graphics, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Psylo Graphics, Inc company nor Brandt Affixing, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Psylo Graphics, Inc nor Brandt Affixing, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Psylo Graphics, Inc company nor Brandt Affixing, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Psylo Graphics, Inc company employs more people globally than Brandt Affixing, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Psylo Graphics, Inc nor Brandt Affixing, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Psylo Graphics, Inc nor Brandt Affixing, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Psylo Graphics, Inc nor Brandt Affixing, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Psylo Graphics, Inc nor Brandt Affixing, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Psylo Graphics, Inc nor Brandt Affixing, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Psylo Graphics, Inc nor Brandt Affixing, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References