Comparison Overview

Psychologische Praxis

VS

Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE

Psychologische Praxis

Viehhofstraße Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia 52066, DE
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.beratungspraxis-awolfs.de

Psychologogische Praxis mit Schwerpunkte Psychotherapie & Mediation. Weiter: Beratung in akuten Lebenssituationen, sowohl als Einzel- , Paar- oder Familienberatung. Als staatlich anerkannte Heilpraktikerin für Psychotherapie unterstütze ich Sie insbesondere bei der Bewältigung von: - psychosomatischen Beschwerden - Angststörungen - Burn-Out - depressive Störungen mit Hilfe von Gesprächen, Hypnose & Entspannungsverfahren. Als Mediatorin, ausgebildet nach den Richtlinien des deutschen Bund der Mediation, biete ich Ihnen professionelle Hilfe bei der Klärung von Konflikten, insbesondere bei: - Familienstreitigkeiten (Trennung, Scheidung, Kinder) - Erbschaftsauseinandersetzungen - Konflikte am Arbeitsplatz - Mieter-Vermieter-Konflikten - Nachbarschaftsstreitigkeiten fair, konstruktiv, zukunftsorientiert !

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE

1211 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://mentalhealthpartnerships.org

Mental Health Partnerships was founded, and continues to thrive, on the basic principle that people with mental health conditions can and do recover because they have the resilience to direct their own journeys in overcoming significant adversity. And while recovery—in all its different forms and paths—is possible for all, there’s a greater chance for recovery in the context of an informed, caring community with family, friends and peers involved. Based on this conviction, we’ve spearheaded changes over six decades that have helped transform mental health services locally, statewide and across the country—all to be more responsive to the priorities set by those served. Not only did our organization play a key role in shutting down state mental hospitals, we ensured that over a hundred million dollars was then infused into community-based mental health services. A big part of that was the creation of Community Behavioral Health (CBH), a city-run entity established to manage behavioral health services under HealthChoices—Pennsylvania’s mandatory managed care plan for Medical Assistance recipients—for some 450,000 Philadelphians who receive Medicaid. And MHP advocacy was vital to the successful effort in the late 1990s to prevent the takeover of CBH by for-profit managed care organizations. MHP was also the first in the Pennsylvania to provide peer-to-peer mental health services from neighborhood drop-in centers, which have evolved into our recovery learning centers, based on what used to be considered a radical idea: that people in recovery could help others with mental health conditions in their respective paths toward recovery by example and through mutual support. Since establishing ourselves as a nonprofit in 1951 as the Mental Health Association of Southeastern Pennsylvania, we now provide more than 40 direct services not just in Philadelphia and the four surrounding counties, but also in South Jersey and the State of Delaware.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 123
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psychologische-praxis.jpeg
Psychologische Praxis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mhphope.jpeg
Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Psychologische Praxis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Psychologische Praxis in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE in 2026.

Incident History — Psychologische Praxis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Psychologische Praxis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psychologische-praxis.jpeg
Psychologische Praxis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mhphope.jpeg
Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Psychologische Praxis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Psychologische Praxis company.

In the current year, Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE company and Psychologische Praxis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE company nor Psychologische Praxis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE company nor Psychologische Praxis company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE company nor Psychologische Praxis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Psychologische Praxis company nor Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Psychologische Praxis company nor Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE company employs more people globally than Psychologische Praxis company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Mental Health Partnerships MHPHOPE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References