Comparison Overview

Psychologische Praxis

VS

Lifeworks Occupational Therapy

Psychologische Praxis

Viehhofstraße Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia 52066, DE
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Psychologogische Praxis mit Schwerpunkte Psychotherapie & Mediation. Weiter: Beratung in akuten Lebenssituationen, sowohl als Einzel- , Paar- oder Familienberatung. Als staatlich anerkannte Heilpraktikerin für Psychotherapie unterstütze ich Sie insbesondere bei der Bewältigung von: - psychosomatischen Beschwerden - Angststörungen - Burn-Out - depressive Störungen mit Hilfe von Gesprächen, Hypnose & Entspannungsverfahren. Als Mediatorin, ausgebildet nach den Richtlinien des deutschen Bund der Mediation, biete ich Ihnen professionelle Hilfe bei der Klärung von Konflikten, insbesondere bei: - Familienstreitigkeiten (Trennung, Scheidung, Kinder) - Erbschaftsauseinandersetzungen - Konflikte am Arbeitsplatz - Mieter-Vermieter-Konflikten - Nachbarschaftsstreitigkeiten fair, konstruktiv, zukunftsorientiert !

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lifeworks Occupational Therapy

150 Walcott Street, Mount Lawley, undefined, 6050, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-10
Between 750 and 799

Lifeworks Occupational Therapy is a comprehensive occupational therapy service helping people with chronic and/or complex conditions to develop skills, enhance function, manage symptoms, and overcome barriers to achieve a better quality of life. We focus on the areas of mental health, persistent pain, chronic fatigue, sleep disorders, connective tissue disorders and functional neurological disorders. We believe that everyone deserves to live a good life. Lifeworks Occupational Therapy exists to give people with chronic or complex health conditions the knowledge, skills and power to move forward with confidence, and overcome barriers, so they can live their best possible life

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psychologische-praxis.jpeg
Psychologische Praxis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifeworks-occupational-therapy.jpeg
Lifeworks Occupational Therapy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Psychologische Praxis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lifeworks Occupational Therapy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Psychologische Praxis in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lifeworks Occupational Therapy in 2026.

Incident History — Psychologische Praxis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Psychologische Praxis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lifeworks Occupational Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lifeworks Occupational Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psychologische-praxis.jpeg
Psychologische Praxis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lifeworks-occupational-therapy.jpeg
Lifeworks Occupational Therapy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lifeworks Occupational Therapy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Psychologische Praxis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lifeworks Occupational Therapy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Psychologische Praxis company.

In the current year, Lifeworks Occupational Therapy company and Psychologische Praxis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lifeworks Occupational Therapy company nor Psychologische Praxis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lifeworks Occupational Therapy company nor Psychologische Praxis company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lifeworks Occupational Therapy company nor Psychologische Praxis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Psychologische Praxis company nor Lifeworks Occupational Therapy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Lifeworks Occupational Therapy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Psychologische Praxis company nor Lifeworks Occupational Therapy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lifeworks Occupational Therapy company employs more people globally than Psychologische Praxis company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Lifeworks Occupational Therapy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Lifeworks Occupational Therapy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Lifeworks Occupational Therapy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Lifeworks Occupational Therapy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Lifeworks Occupational Therapy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Psychologische Praxis nor Lifeworks Occupational Therapy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N