Comparison Overview

PSI Fluid Power Ltd.

VS

SIPA

PSI Fluid Power Ltd.

13771 Mayfield Pl, Richmond, BC, V6V-1Y3, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

P.S.I. Fluid Power Ltd. is an industry leader providing superior hydraulic components and service to our customers for over 50 years. PSI's commitment to quality combined with excellent service has resulted in the company becoming one of Canada's largest and most trusted distributors of hydraulic components, electrical controls, and specialized fire suppression systems..

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SIPA

via caduti del lavoro, 3, Vittorio Veneto, tv, 31029, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

SIPA, one of the major international players for the supply of complete bottling lines, is a full-fledged solution provider with vast expertise, technologies and services. SIPA offer includes preform and bottle design, engineering and industrialization up to the supply of injection and blowing molds for any type of PET machines in the market. SIPA provides the full range of PET container production machines (single stage machines, linear and rotary blowmolders, preform injection machines) as well as product preparations systems, filling/capping monoblocs, pallettising/depallettising systems, cartoning solutions, robotized applications and conveyors. SIPA is cutting-edge technology for satisfying the demand of beverage, food and non-food producers throughout the world. The company can rely on 16 sales branches, 6 manufacturing centers (two sites in Italy, one in Mexico, China, Brazil and Romania) and 23 service centers to assist clients from everything from plant start-up to spare parts. A 360° service with a constant desire for innovation and state-of-the-art technology. SIPA, headquartered in Vittorio Veneto (Italy), is part of Zoppas Industries Group. For more information visit http://www.sipa.it

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1,299
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psi-fluidpower-ltd.jpeg
PSI Fluid Power Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sipa-s-p-a-.jpeg
SIPA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PSI Fluid Power Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SIPA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PSI Fluid Power Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SIPA in 2025.

Incident History — PSI Fluid Power Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PSI Fluid Power Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SIPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SIPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psi-fluidpower-ltd.jpeg
PSI Fluid Power Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sipa-s-p-a-.jpeg
SIPA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SIPA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PSI Fluid Power Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SIPA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PSI Fluid Power Ltd. company.

In the current year, SIPA company and PSI Fluid Power Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SIPA company nor PSI Fluid Power Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SIPA company nor PSI Fluid Power Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SIPA company nor PSI Fluid Power Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PSI Fluid Power Ltd. company nor SIPA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PSI Fluid Power Ltd. nor SIPA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PSI Fluid Power Ltd. company nor SIPA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SIPA company employs more people globally than PSI Fluid Power Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither PSI Fluid Power Ltd. nor SIPA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PSI Fluid Power Ltd. nor SIPA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PSI Fluid Power Ltd. nor SIPA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PSI Fluid Power Ltd. nor SIPA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PSI Fluid Power Ltd. nor SIPA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PSI Fluid Power Ltd. nor SIPA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H