Comparison Overview

PS.Design

VS

The Point Collective

PS.Design

2921 Walnut Street, Denver, CO, 80205, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

We’ve been in the graphic design and branding business for years. And now we’re pushing the boundaries of our traditional work by creating brand-relevant experimental art and immersive experiences. Our belief is that a brand can embrace art as a means of communicating culture, values, and a clients willingness to express themselves in non-traditional ways. That a full sensory immersive experience can provide access and impact to a brand that digital design can’t always fully express. That brands that embrace art illustrate an understanding that their spaces, events and can be wildly experimental and fun.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Point Collective

1248 Sierra Mar, San Jose, CA, 95118, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

We are a women founded multidisciplinary graphic design and marketing collective. And we are so much more. Because you are so much more. By focusing on where creativity and strategy meet, we are able to offer solutions that transcend problems big and small. We have roots in the Bay Area and on the Central Coast of California but serve clients worldwide. Our clients span many industries and range from tiny to enterprise, but they all have one thing in common — they do incredible things.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psdotdesign.jpeg
PS.Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-point-collective.jpeg
The Point Collective
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PS.Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Point Collective
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PS.Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Point Collective in 2025.

Incident History — PS.Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PS.Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Point Collective (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Point Collective cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psdotdesign.jpeg
PS.Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-point-collective.jpeg
The Point Collective
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PS.Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Point Collective company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Point Collective company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PS.Design company.

In the current year, The Point Collective company and PS.Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Point Collective company nor PS.Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Point Collective company nor PS.Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Point Collective company nor PS.Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PS.Design company nor The Point Collective company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PS.Design nor The Point Collective holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PS.Design company nor The Point Collective company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Point Collective company employs more people globally than PS.Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither PS.Design nor The Point Collective holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PS.Design nor The Point Collective holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PS.Design nor The Point Collective holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PS.Design nor The Point Collective holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PS.Design nor The Point Collective holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PS.Design nor The Point Collective holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X