Comparison Overview

Prudential plc

VS

Lincoln Financial

Prudential plc

13/F, One International Finance Centre, Central, undefined, undefined, HK
Last Update: 2025-12-09

In Asia and Africa, Prudential has been providing familiar, trusted financial security to people for 100 years. Today, headquartered in Hong Kong and London, we are ranked top three in 12 Asian markets with 18 million customers, around 68,000 average monthly active agents and access to over 27,000 bank branches in the region. Prudential is focused on opportunities in the most exciting growth markets in Asia and Africa. With access to over 4 billion people in both these regions, we are investing in broadening our presence and building our leadership in the life and asset management markets. We are committed to making a positive impact on our customers, our employees and our communities by delivering the best savings, health and protection solutions to people so they can get the most out of life. Visit our websites for more information Prudential plc: https://www.prudentialplc.com/ Prudence Foundation: https://www.prudentialplc.com/en/prudence-foundation

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 53,381
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lincoln Financial

150 N. Radnor-Chester Road, Radnor, PA, US, 19087
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Lincoln Financial (NYSE: LNC) helps people to confidently plan for their version of a successful future. We focus on identifying a clear path to financial security, with products including annuities, investments, life insurance, group protection, and retirement plan services. With our 120-year track record of expertise and integrity, millions of customers trust our solutions and service to help put their goals in reach.  Your tomorrow. Our priority. For social media community guidelines: https://visit.lfg.com/4hJHCb2. Lincoln Financial Distributors, a broker-dealer, is the wholesale distribution organization of Lincoln Financial. Lincoln Financial is the marketing name for Lincoln National Corporation and its affiliates including The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Fort Wayne, IN, and Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York, Syracuse, NY. Lincoln Financial℠ affiliates, their distributors, and their respective employees, representatives and/or insurance agents do not provide tax, accounting or legal advice.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 10,643
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
8
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prudential-corporation-asia.jpeg
Prudential plc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincolnfinancial.jpeg
Lincoln Financial
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Prudential plc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lincoln Financial
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prudential plc in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lincoln Financial in 2025.

Incident History — Prudential plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prudential plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lincoln Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lincoln Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prudential-corporation-asia.jpeg
Prudential plc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincolnfinancial.jpeg
Lincoln Financial
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Prudential plc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lincoln Financial company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Lincoln Financial company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Prudential plc company has not reported any.

In the current year, Lincoln Financial company and Prudential plc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lincoln Financial company nor Prudential plc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Lincoln Financial company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Prudential plc company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lincoln Financial company nor Prudential plc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Prudential plc company nor Lincoln Financial company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Prudential plc nor Lincoln Financial holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Prudential plc company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lincoln Financial company.

Prudential plc company employs more people globally than Lincoln Financial company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Prudential plc nor Lincoln Financial holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Prudential plc nor Lincoln Financial holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Prudential plc nor Lincoln Financial holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Prudential plc nor Lincoln Financial holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Prudential plc nor Lincoln Financial holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Prudential plc nor Lincoln Financial holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N