Comparison Overview

Prudential plc

VS

J.P. Morgan

Prudential plc

13/F, One International Finance Centre, Central, undefined, undefined, HK
Last Update: 2025-12-09

In Asia and Africa, Prudential has been providing familiar, trusted financial security to people for 100 years. Today, headquartered in Hong Kong and London, we are ranked top three in 12 Asian markets with 18 million customers, around 68,000 average monthly active agents and access to over 27,000 bank branches in the region. Prudential is focused on opportunities in the most exciting growth markets in Asia and Africa. With access to over 4 billion people in both these regions, we are investing in broadening our presence and building our leadership in the life and asset management markets. We are committed to making a positive impact on our customers, our employees and our communities by delivering the best savings, health and protection solutions to people so they can get the most out of life. Visit our websites for more information Prudential plc: https://www.prudentialplc.com/ Prudence Foundation: https://www.prudentialplc.com/en/prudence-foundation

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 53,381
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

J.P. Morgan

270 Park Avenue, New York, NY, US, 10017
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

J.P. Morgan is a leader in financial services, offering solutions to clients in more than 100 countries with one of the most comprehensive global product platforms available. We have been helping our clients to do business and manage their wealth for more than 200 years. Our business has been built upon our core principle of putting our clients'​ interests first. J.P. Morgan is part of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), a global financial services firm. Social Media Terms and Conditions: https://bit.ly/JPMCSocialTerms © 2017 JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase is an equal opportunity and affirmative action employer Disability/Veteran.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 78,072
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prudential-corporation-asia.jpeg
Prudential plc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jpmorgan.jpeg
J.P. Morgan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Prudential plc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
J.P. Morgan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prudential plc in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J.P. Morgan in 2025.

Incident History — Prudential plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prudential plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — J.P. Morgan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J.P. Morgan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prudential-corporation-asia.jpeg
Prudential plc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jpmorgan.jpeg
J.P. Morgan
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

J.P. Morgan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Prudential plc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

J.P. Morgan company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Prudential plc company has not reported any.

In the current year, J.P. Morgan company and Prudential plc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither J.P. Morgan company nor Prudential plc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

J.P. Morgan company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Prudential plc company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither J.P. Morgan company nor Prudential plc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Prudential plc company nor J.P. Morgan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Prudential plc nor J.P. Morgan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Prudential plc company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to J.P. Morgan company.

J.P. Morgan company employs more people globally than Prudential plc company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Prudential plc nor J.P. Morgan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Prudential plc nor J.P. Morgan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Prudential plc nor J.P. Morgan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Prudential plc nor J.P. Morgan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Prudential plc nor J.P. Morgan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Prudential plc nor J.P. Morgan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N