Comparison Overview

Provincie Groningen

VS

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)

Provincie Groningen

Sint Jansstraat 4, Groningen, Groningen, NL, 9712 JN
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Vanuit hartje Groningen zetten ruim 1000 collega's zich dagelijks in voor een mooie provincie. Waar iedereen fijn kan wonen, werken en leven. We kijken voorbij de horizon en zoeken naar oplossingen die echt het verschil maken. Met hart voor Groningen, oog en oor voor de omgeving, en passie voor ons werk bouwen wij samen aan de toekomst van onze provincie. Kom jij ook het verschil maken? Kijk op www.werkenbijprovinciegroningen.nl en wie weet word jij onze nieuwe collega!

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 660
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)

undefined, Washington, DC, 20004, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At CREW, we use aggressive legal actions, in-depth investigations, and innovative policy and reform work to achieve that vision. We take on big fights against powerful opponents, from the President of the United States to wealthy dark money donors. Despite long odds, we continue to have victories large and small, thanks to our innovative legal strategies and unrelenting dedication.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/provincie-groningen.jpeg
Provincie Groningen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/citizens-for-responsibility-and-ethics-in-washington-crew-.jpeg
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Provincie Groningen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Provincie Groningen in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) in 2025.

Incident History — Provincie Groningen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Provincie Groningen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/provincie-groningen.jpeg
Provincie Groningen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/citizens-for-responsibility-and-ethics-in-washington-crew-.jpeg
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Provincie Groningen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Provincie Groningen company.

In the current year, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company and Provincie Groningen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company nor Provincie Groningen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company nor Provincie Groningen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company nor Provincie Groningen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Provincie Groningen company nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Provincie Groningen nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Provincie Groningen company nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Provincie Groningen company employs more people globally than Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Provincie Groningen nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Provincie Groningen nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Provincie Groningen nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Provincie Groningen nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Provincie Groningen nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Provincie Groningen nor Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H