Comparison Overview

Provincie Antwerpen

VS

The Competition Commission South Africa

Provincie Antwerpen

Koningin Elisabethlei 22, Antwerpen, 2018, BE
Last Update: 2025-11-23
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
www.provincieantwerpen.be

De provincie Antwerpen, dat zijn 1,9 miljoen inwoners, 67 gemeenten en 2855 km² aan potentieel. Met een wereldhaven links, de natuurrijke Kempen rechts en alles daartussen. Als streekbestuur is de provincie groot genoeg om veel te doen en klein genoeg om veel te betekenen. Vaak achter de schermen, maar altijd als drijvende kracht achter initiatieven die gemeentegrenzen overstijgen. Met onze personeelskracht – 1700 pk bij de provincie Antwerpen en 1150 pk bij het Provinciaal Onderwijs Antwerpen – werkt de provincie elke dag voor lokale besturen en voor jou aan mobiliteit, economie, landbouw, erfgoed, natuur, water en onderwijs. Van fietsostrades tot klimaatprojecten en recreatiedomeinen: je komt haar vaker tegen dan je denkt.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 906
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Competition Commission South Africa

77 Mentjies Street, Pretoria, 0001, ZA
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749
http://www.compcom.co.za

The Competition Commission has a range of functions in terms of Section 21 of the Competition Act. These include investigating anti-competitive conduct in contravention of the Chapter 2 of the Act; assessing the impact of mergers and acquisitions on competition and taking appropriate action; monitoring competition levels and market transparency in the economy; identifying impediments to competition and playing an advocacy role in addressing these impediments. Anti-competitive conduct, whether through price-fixing, information exchange or the abuse of a dominant position, has adverse effects on both consumers and the economy. Consumers are deprived of low prices and product choice. The overall economic effect would be a slow or negative economic growth rate, as companies become lazy to compete and innovate. The Commission balances issues related to consumer welfare with the broader social and economic goals outlined in the Competition Act, such as employment, international competitiveness, efficiency and technology gains, as well as the ability of small and medium sized businesses and firms owned or controlled by historically disadvantaged persons to compete. In order to ensure the consistent application of the Act across sectors, the Commission may negotiate agreements with other regulatory authorities, participate in their proceedings and advise, or receive advice from, any regulatory authority. The Commission is independent but its decisions may be appealed to the Competition Tribunal and the Competition Appeal Court. Commissioner, Tembinkosi Bonakele, is the Chief Executive Officer of the Commission and is responsible for the general administration of the Commission and for carrying out any function assigned to it in terms of the Competition Act. The two Acting Deputy Commissioners, Hardin Ratshisusu and Oliver Josie, assist the Commissioner in carrying out the functions of the Commission.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 316
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/provincie-antwerpen.jpeg
Provincie Antwerpen
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/competition-commission-of-south-africa.jpeg
The Competition Commission South Africa
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Provincie Antwerpen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Competition Commission South Africa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Provincie Antwerpen in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Competition Commission South Africa in 2025.

Incident History — Provincie Antwerpen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Provincie Antwerpen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Competition Commission South Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Competition Commission South Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/provincie-antwerpen.jpeg
Provincie Antwerpen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/competition-commission-of-south-africa.jpeg
The Competition Commission South Africa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Provincie Antwerpen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Competition Commission South Africa company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Competition Commission South Africa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Provincie Antwerpen company.

In the current year, The Competition Commission South Africa company and Provincie Antwerpen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Competition Commission South Africa company nor Provincie Antwerpen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Competition Commission South Africa company nor Provincie Antwerpen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Competition Commission South Africa company nor Provincie Antwerpen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Provincie Antwerpen company nor The Competition Commission South Africa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Provincie Antwerpen nor The Competition Commission South Africa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Provincie Antwerpen company nor The Competition Commission South Africa company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Provincie Antwerpen company employs more people globally than The Competition Commission South Africa company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Provincie Antwerpen nor The Competition Commission South Africa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Provincie Antwerpen nor The Competition Commission South Africa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Provincie Antwerpen nor The Competition Commission South Africa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Provincie Antwerpen nor The Competition Commission South Africa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Provincie Antwerpen nor The Competition Commission South Africa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Provincie Antwerpen nor The Competition Commission South Africa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References