Comparison Overview

Providence Institute for Human Caring

VS

ELSAN

Providence Institute for Human Caring

1801 Lind Ave SW, Renton, WA, US, 98057
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Institute for Human Caring transforms healthcare to make it more personal and less transactional. Email us at [email protected] to find out more.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

ELSAN

58 bis, rue la Boétie Paris, France 75008, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

ELSAN, groupe leader de l’hospitalisation privée en France, compte aujourd’hui plus de 28 000 collaborateurs et 7500 médecins libéraux qui exercent dans les 212 établissements et centres du groupe. Ils prennent en charge plus de 4,8 millions de patients par an. Notre mission : offrir à chacun des soins de qualité, innovants et humains. Notre raison d'être : Agir pour la santé de tous, au coeur des territoires.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/providence-institute-for-human-caring.jpeg
Providence Institute for Human Caring
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elsan.jpeg
ELSAN
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Providence Institute for Human Caring
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ELSAN
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Providence Institute for Human Caring in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ELSAN in 2025.

Incident History — Providence Institute for Human Caring (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Providence Institute for Human Caring cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ELSAN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ELSAN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/providence-institute-for-human-caring.jpeg
Providence Institute for Human Caring
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unauthorized data access and system encryption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elsan.jpeg
ELSAN
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ELSAN company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Providence Institute for Human Caring company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Providence Institute for Human Caring company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ELSAN company has not reported any.

In the current year, ELSAN company and Providence Institute for Human Caring company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Providence Institute for Human Caring company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while ELSAN company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Providence Institute for Human Caring company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other ELSAN company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ELSAN company nor Providence Institute for Human Caring company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Providence Institute for Human Caring company nor ELSAN company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Providence Institute for Human Caring nor ELSAN holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Providence Institute for Human Caring company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ELSAN company.

Neither Providence Institute for Human Caring nor ELSAN holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Providence Institute for Human Caring nor ELSAN holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Providence Institute for Human Caring nor ELSAN holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Providence Institute for Human Caring nor ELSAN holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Providence Institute for Human Caring nor ELSAN holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Providence Institute for Human Caring nor ELSAN holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H