Comparison Overview

Proteus Snowboards

VS

True Ames Fins

Proteus Snowboards

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.proteussnowboards.com/

We are a niche snowboard manufacturer that offers Patented Adjustable Camber Technology incorporated into all of our boards. This allows you to change the shape of your board any time you want to match your conditions and riding preference. We are seeking to revolutionize the industry with innovative new technology, top-notch materials, and an intense focus on customization and customer satisfaction.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

True Ames Fins

74 Aero Camino #A, Goleta, California, 93117, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.trueames.com

True Ames has been crafting the highest quality surfboard fins made from the best materials available for close to 40 years. As a watering hole for the surf industry's top craftsman, we specialize in community and design. True Ames offers a wide variety of fins within our collection in order to support an array of wave riding vehicles. We pride ourselves in balancing a surfer and shaper driven design ethic, with our commitment to innovation and production excellence.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/proteus-snowboards.jpeg
Proteus Snowboards
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/true-ames-fins.jpeg
True Ames Fins
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Proteus Snowboards
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
True Ames Fins
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Proteus Snowboards in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for True Ames Fins in 2025.

Incident History — Proteus Snowboards (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Proteus Snowboards cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — True Ames Fins (X = Date, Y = Severity)

True Ames Fins cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/proteus-snowboards.jpeg
Proteus Snowboards
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/true-ames-fins.jpeg
True Ames Fins
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Proteus Snowboards company and True Ames Fins company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, True Ames Fins company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Proteus Snowboards company.

In the current year, True Ames Fins company and Proteus Snowboards company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither True Ames Fins company nor Proteus Snowboards company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither True Ames Fins company nor Proteus Snowboards company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither True Ames Fins company nor Proteus Snowboards company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Proteus Snowboards company nor True Ames Fins company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Proteus Snowboards nor True Ames Fins holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Proteus Snowboards company nor True Ames Fins company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

True Ames Fins company employs more people globally than Proteus Snowboards company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Proteus Snowboards nor True Ames Fins holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Proteus Snowboards nor True Ames Fins holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Proteus Snowboards nor True Ames Fins holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Proteus Snowboards nor True Ames Fins holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Proteus Snowboards nor True Ames Fins holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Proteus Snowboards nor True Ames Fins holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References