Comparison Overview

Protech Printing

VS

Vital Signs of Oklahoma

Protech Printing

975 Cobb Place Boulevard NW, Kennesaw, GA 30144, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.protechprinting.com

Protech Printing is a premier provider of high-quality commercial printing solutions, delivering excellence in print production and branded materials. With a commitment to precision, innovation, and customer satisfaction, we help businesses of all sizes bring their ideas to life with professional printing services. Services include Digital & Offset Printing, Signage, Promo, Apparel, Direct Mail and Graphic Design. BOTTOM LINE - WE GET THE JOB DONE! A family owned and operated company, Protech Printing prides itself on providing exceptional customer service, while offering a wide variety of products and services at the highest quality to meet our customer's needs. We have the knowledge and commitment to ensure correct evaluation of your printing needs and the most economical and efficient solutions to meet your budget.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Vital Signs of Oklahoma

3728 E 2nd St. Suite A, Edmond, OK, 73034, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vitalsignsok.com

Since 1996, Vital Signs of Oklahoma has designed and produced graphic and visual communications that attract customers, sell products and inform audiences. How Vital are your Signs? Today Vital Signs has grown into a full service commercial sign company and promotional products. Signs are in our name, but our products include a full array of marketing and graphic production capabilities. We are proud of our history here at Vital Signs, and we are continually adapting to provide a great service and product for all our clients. Visit Us www.vitalsignsok.com or www.vitalpromotional.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/protech-printing-&-graphics-inc..jpeg
Protech Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vital-signs-of-oklahoma.jpeg
Vital Signs of Oklahoma
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Protech Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vital Signs of Oklahoma
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Protech Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vital Signs of Oklahoma in 2025.

Incident History — Protech Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Protech Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vital Signs of Oklahoma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vital Signs of Oklahoma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/protech-printing-&-graphics-inc..jpeg
Protech Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vital-signs-of-oklahoma.jpeg
Vital Signs of Oklahoma
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Vital Signs of Oklahoma company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Protech Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Vital Signs of Oklahoma company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Protech Printing company.

In the current year, Vital Signs of Oklahoma company and Protech Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vital Signs of Oklahoma company nor Protech Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vital Signs of Oklahoma company nor Protech Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vital Signs of Oklahoma company nor Protech Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Protech Printing company nor Vital Signs of Oklahoma company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Protech Printing nor Vital Signs of Oklahoma holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Protech Printing company nor Vital Signs of Oklahoma company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Protech Printing company employs more people globally than Vital Signs of Oklahoma company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Protech Printing nor Vital Signs of Oklahoma holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Protech Printing nor Vital Signs of Oklahoma holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Protech Printing nor Vital Signs of Oklahoma holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Protech Printing nor Vital Signs of Oklahoma holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Protech Printing nor Vital Signs of Oklahoma holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Protech Printing nor Vital Signs of Oklahoma holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References