Comparison Overview

Prosper Australia

VS

The LIBRE Initiative

Prosper Australia

64 Harcourt St, North Melbourne, 3051, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Since 1890, Prosper Australia has been an independent voice for economic justice, specialising in land economics and the reform of public revenue systems. We research, educate, and advocate for policies that direct the benefits of land and natural resources toward the common good—ensuring a fairer, more sustainable economy for future generations. Our work combines rigorous research with public engagement, shaping evidence-based policy reforms that address housing affordability, economic inequality, and sustainable urban development. The reforms we advocate for are both fairer and more efficient than our current system. Recieve our latest updates: https://www.prosper.org.au/subscribe/ We are a not-for-profit research institute. Make a tax-deductible contribution to our research: https://www.prosper.org.au/donate/

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The LIBRE Initiative

1310 N Courthouse Rd, Arlington, Virginia, US, 22201
Last Update: 2025-11-27

LIBRE seeks to become the leading Hispanic voice across the nation that strives for freedom-minded solutions that benefit all. With a limited government, comes unlimited opportunities. LIBRE plays a distinct and critical role in helping to connect this growing and relatively young population to our vision of economic opportunity. The mission of LIBRE is to empower the Hispanic community to reach their full potential. Striving to remove barriers that keep members of this community from pursuing their potential.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prosper-australia.jpeg
Prosper Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-libre-initiative.jpeg
The LIBRE Initiative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Prosper Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The LIBRE Initiative
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prosper Australia in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The LIBRE Initiative in 2025.

Incident History — Prosper Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prosper Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The LIBRE Initiative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The LIBRE Initiative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prosper-australia.jpeg
Prosper Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-libre-initiative.jpeg
The LIBRE Initiative
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The LIBRE Initiative company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Prosper Australia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The LIBRE Initiative company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Prosper Australia company.

In the current year, The LIBRE Initiative company and Prosper Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The LIBRE Initiative company nor Prosper Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The LIBRE Initiative company nor Prosper Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The LIBRE Initiative company nor Prosper Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Prosper Australia company nor The LIBRE Initiative company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Prosper Australia nor The LIBRE Initiative holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The LIBRE Initiative company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Prosper Australia company.

The LIBRE Initiative company employs more people globally than Prosper Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Prosper Australia nor The LIBRE Initiative holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Prosper Australia nor The LIBRE Initiative holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Prosper Australia nor The LIBRE Initiative holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Prosper Australia nor The LIBRE Initiative holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Prosper Australia nor The LIBRE Initiative holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Prosper Australia nor The LIBRE Initiative holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H