Comparison Overview

Prosegur

VS

GardaWorld

Prosegur

Pajaritos, 24, Madrid, Madrid, 28007, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

At Prosegur, being aware of who we are is what defines our identity and commitment. 🌐 We are Prosegur. Leaders in the private security sector for more than 45 years and in more than 30 countries. 💡 We are innovation. We reinvent ourselves, adapt and integrate trends to offer more advanced security. 👥 We are people. More than 150,000 employees on 5 continents working for a common purpose: building a more secure world. 🌱 We are sustainability. Taking care of our natural and social environments responsibly is part of our DNA. We are a global company and a leader in the private security sector. We have five lines of business: 🟡 Prosegur Security 🟡 Prosegur Cash 🟡 Prosegur Alarms 🟡 Cipher 🟡 AVOS Tech Yes, we are Prosegur.

NAICS: 5616
NAICS Definition: Investigation and Security Services
Employees: 57,912
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

GardaWorld

2300 Émile-Bélanger, Saint-Laurent , Quebec, CA, H4R 3J4
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

GardaWorld is the world’s largest privately-owned security services company, offering cash services, physical and specialized security solutions, and with our Crisis24 portal, the dissemination of verified information related to international security. GardaWorld est la plus importante entreprise privée de sécurité au monde, offrant des services de transport de valeurs, des solutions de sécurité physique et spécialisée, et avec le portail Crisis24, la diffusion d’informations vérifiées en lien avec la sécurité internationale.

NAICS: 5616
NAICS Definition: Investigation and Security Services
Employees: 23,109
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prosegur.jpeg
Prosegur
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gardaworld.jpeg
GardaWorld
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Prosegur
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GardaWorld
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prosegur in 2025.

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GardaWorld in 2025.

Incident History — Prosegur (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prosegur cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GardaWorld (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GardaWorld cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prosegur.jpeg
Prosegur
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2019
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gardaworld.jpeg
GardaWorld
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Prosegur company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GardaWorld company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Prosegur and GardaWorld have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, GardaWorld company and Prosegur company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GardaWorld company nor Prosegur company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

GardaWorld company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Prosegur company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Prosegur company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while GardaWorld company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Prosegur company nor GardaWorld company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Prosegur nor GardaWorld holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Prosegur company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GardaWorld company.

Prosegur company employs more people globally than GardaWorld company, reflecting its scale as a Security and Investigations.

Neither Prosegur nor GardaWorld holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Prosegur nor GardaWorld holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Prosegur nor GardaWorld holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Prosegur nor GardaWorld holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Prosegur nor GardaWorld holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Prosegur nor GardaWorld holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H