Comparison Overview

ProQuest

VS

Jefferson-Madison Regional Library

ProQuest

789 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106-1346, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

ProQuest, part of Clarivate, is committed to supporting the important work happening in the world’s research and learning communities. The company curates content that matters to the advancement of knowledge, assembling an archive of billions of vetted, indexed documents. It simplifies workflows so that people and institutions use time effectively. And because ProQuest connects information communities, complex networks of systems and processes work together efficiently. With ProQuest, finding answers and deriving insights is straightforward and leads to extraordinary outcomes. ProQuest and its companies and affiliates – Ex Libris, Alexander Street, Bowker – stand for better research, better learning, better insights. ProQuest enables people to change their world.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 999
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jefferson-Madison Regional Library

201 E Market St, Charlottesville, 22902, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849

The Jefferson-Madison Regional Library serves Central Virginia and enhances the quality of life by providing equal access to information. The library serves all ages, promotes reading, serves as a life-long educational resource, and supports democracy by fostering the free exchange of ideas. JMRL library cards give the public free access to books, eBooks, audiobooks, DVDs, music, internet access on public computers, online databases, meeting rooms, wifi, and educational programming for all ages.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/proquest.jpeg
ProQuest
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jefferson-madison-regional-library.jpeg
Jefferson-Madison Regional Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ProQuest
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jefferson-Madison Regional Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ProQuest in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jefferson-Madison Regional Library in 2025.

Incident History — ProQuest (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ProQuest cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jefferson-Madison Regional Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jefferson-Madison Regional Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/proquest.jpeg
ProQuest
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jefferson-madison-regional-library.jpeg
Jefferson-Madison Regional Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jefferson-Madison Regional Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ProQuest company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jefferson-Madison Regional Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ProQuest company.

In the current year, Jefferson-Madison Regional Library company and ProQuest company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jefferson-Madison Regional Library company nor ProQuest company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jefferson-Madison Regional Library company nor ProQuest company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jefferson-Madison Regional Library company nor ProQuest company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ProQuest company nor Jefferson-Madison Regional Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ProQuest nor Jefferson-Madison Regional Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ProQuest company nor Jefferson-Madison Regional Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ProQuest company employs more people globally than Jefferson-Madison Regional Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither ProQuest nor Jefferson-Madison Regional Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ProQuest nor Jefferson-Madison Regional Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ProQuest nor Jefferson-Madison Regional Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ProQuest nor Jefferson-Madison Regional Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ProQuest nor Jefferson-Madison Regional Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ProQuest nor Jefferson-Madison Regional Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H