Comparison Overview

PromoTec, Inc.

VS

Fineprint Nottingham

PromoTec, Inc.

134 Martinvale Ln, San Jose, California, 95119, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

PromoTec offers a variety of decorating options for product manufacturers, promotional product companies, and OEM distributors. Pad printing, screen printing and viny cutting are just a few options that we provide. Low minimums and quick turns make PromoTec the best choice for Bay Area companies looking for fast, relaible, and local service.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fineprint Nottingham

Hooton Street, Nottingham, undefined, NG3 2NJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Fineprint (Nottingham) Ltd. was founded in 1986 by Philip Nicol and Andrew Rajchel. The aim was to harness our many years of knowledge and experience in the printing industry to produce the highest quality of print and creative design at a competitive price. We offer a comprehensive in-house service, producing a broad selection of print and direct mail services. Our extensive client list have come to appreciate our friendly, relaxed and professional approach. From our beginnings back in 1986, Fineprint has grown steadily and are proud of the fact that all our staff have all been with us for a number of years. This highly experienced and close-knit team enables us to provide a wide range of services. Our aim from the start was to achieve concept to completion of printing jobs under one roof, all in-house. In order to provide a full service to clients we can also provide storage on site to hold customer stock at no extra charge.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/promotec.jpeg
PromoTec, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fineprint-nottingham.jpeg
Fineprint Nottingham
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PromoTec, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fineprint Nottingham
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PromoTec, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fineprint Nottingham in 2025.

Incident History — PromoTec, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PromoTec, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fineprint Nottingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fineprint Nottingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/promotec.jpeg
PromoTec, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fineprint-nottingham.jpeg
Fineprint Nottingham
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PromoTec, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fineprint Nottingham company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fineprint Nottingham company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PromoTec, Inc. company.

In the current year, Fineprint Nottingham company and PromoTec, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fineprint Nottingham company nor PromoTec, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fineprint Nottingham company nor PromoTec, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fineprint Nottingham company nor PromoTec, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PromoTec, Inc. company nor Fineprint Nottingham company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PromoTec, Inc. nor Fineprint Nottingham holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PromoTec, Inc. company nor Fineprint Nottingham company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PromoTec, Inc. company employs more people globally than Fineprint Nottingham company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither PromoTec, Inc. nor Fineprint Nottingham holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PromoTec, Inc. nor Fineprint Nottingham holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PromoTec, Inc. nor Fineprint Nottingham holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PromoTec, Inc. nor Fineprint Nottingham holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PromoTec, Inc. nor Fineprint Nottingham holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PromoTec, Inc. nor Fineprint Nottingham holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N