Comparison Overview

Promontory Press

VS

Washingtonian Magazine

Promontory Press

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.promontorypress.com/

A proud group of West Coasters who love writing, reading and getting new authors to market. We're a hybrid book publisher that combines the strength of traditional publishing with elements of print-on-demand publishing. Our authors share the financial investment in the book with us. We provide an existing team of marketing, sales and writing professionals that provide comprehensive publishing services that take your book from first draft to the floors of major book stores throughout North America.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Washingtonian Magazine

1828 L Street NW, Washington, D.C., undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.washingtonian.com

Washingtonian, the magazine Washington lives by, is the region’s top source of information for dining, shopping, entertainment, and personalities. It has been Washington’s most trusted guide to living, working, and playing in the area for more than four decades thanks to features like “100 Very Best Restaurants,” “Top Doctors,” and “Great Places to Live.” The print magazine is read each month by more than 400,000 people, who spend an average of 96 minutes with each issue and save each issue for an average of five months. Washingtonian.com reaches more than a million unique readers every month. Washingtonian is a five-time National Magazine Award winner for its reporting and writing.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/promontory-press.jpeg
Promontory Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washingtonian-magazine.jpeg
Washingtonian Magazine
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Promontory Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Washingtonian Magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Promontory Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washingtonian Magazine in 2025.

Incident History — Promontory Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Promontory Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Washingtonian Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washingtonian Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/promontory-press.jpeg
Promontory Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washingtonian-magazine.jpeg
Washingtonian Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Promontory Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Washingtonian Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Washingtonian Magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Promontory Press company.

In the current year, Washingtonian Magazine company and Promontory Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Washingtonian Magazine company nor Promontory Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Washingtonian Magazine company nor Promontory Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Washingtonian Magazine company nor Promontory Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Promontory Press company nor Washingtonian Magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Promontory Press nor Washingtonian Magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Promontory Press company nor Washingtonian Magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Washingtonian Magazine company employs more people globally than Promontory Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Promontory Press nor Washingtonian Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Promontory Press nor Washingtonian Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Promontory Press nor Washingtonian Magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Promontory Press nor Washingtonian Magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Promontory Press nor Washingtonian Magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Promontory Press nor Washingtonian Magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References