Comparison Overview

Promia, Inc.

VS

Giza

Promia, Inc.

160 Spear Street #320, San Francsico, CA, US, 94105
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.promia.com

PROMIA, an established development firm and software provider since 1991, is in the business of providing solutions that are designed to support highly secure, reliable, scalable and interoperable business applications. PROMIA's open-standard solutions comply with the newest emerging security regulations and specifications, providing high levels of information security assurance. PROMIA has targeted energy and power industries, military, government and financial institutions, developing sophisticated new intrusion detection tools that employ Artificial Intelligence techniques on high speed, high volume network systems.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Giza

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849
http://www.giza.dk

Giza is a team of professionals, based in the UK and Denmark, all working to world standards of quality. We’re good at what we do, with the track record to prove it. Our customers are all around the globe. How we work... We love engaging with people of different talents who are deeply involved and strongly committed to new ideas, whatever their backgrounds. We also like to work to one very clear principle – combining world-class quality with solid reliability to bring IT costs down to a manageable level. We’ve plenty of other cost-savers to recommend too. Just contact us and we’ll get them working for you. 1 visible recommendation for this posit

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 201
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/promia-inc..jpeg
Promia, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/giza.jpeg
Giza
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Promia, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Giza
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Promia, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Giza in 2025.

Incident History — Promia, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Promia, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Giza (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Giza cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/promia-inc..jpeg
Promia, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/giza.jpeg
Giza
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Giza company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Promia, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Giza company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Promia, Inc. company.

In the current year, Giza company and Promia, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Giza company nor Promia, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Giza company nor Promia, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Giza company nor Promia, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Promia, Inc. company nor Giza company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Promia, Inc. nor Giza holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Promia, Inc. company nor Giza company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Giza company employs more people globally than Promia, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Promia, Inc. nor Giza holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Promia, Inc. nor Giza holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Promia, Inc. nor Giza holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Promia, Inc. nor Giza holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Promia, Inc. nor Giza holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Promia, Inc. nor Giza holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References