Comparison Overview

Project Engineering

VS

Whiteline Group Ltd

Project Engineering

Unit 2 Ardee Business Park, Ardee, Co. Louth, A92 PA49, IE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Project Engineering are a leading provider of mechanical engineering and product development services to the manufacturing and technology sectors. We have an established track record of developing successful products and delivery of complex engineering projects. Based in County Monaghan, our team of professional engineers provide a consistently high level of service to our customers in Ireland, the UK and China. We have experience in a wide range of industries and sectors including; - waste processing - wind energy - biomass - consumer products However our progressive and flexible approach ensures that we are always ready to take on new challenges.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Whiteline Group Ltd

26-36 Hawthorn Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN23 6QA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1983, we are the largest independent fabricator of PVCu windows and doors in the South East. From our factory in Eastbourne we supply and support our customers throughout London, the South East and beyond. We work with our customers, in partnership, delivering the right British made products, services and support to grow their business. Listening, learning and understanding how we can actively help them to succeed. Are you looking for a different type of supplier that can deliver a different type of relationship? A full range of energy efficient windows, conservatories , doors and accessories? Market leading specifications and the PlatinumNRG brand to promote them?

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/project-engineering.jpeg
Project Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whiteline-group-ltd.jpeg
Whiteline Group Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Project Engineering
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Whiteline Group Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Project Engineering in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whiteline Group Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Project Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Project Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Whiteline Group Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whiteline Group Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/project-engineering.jpeg
Project Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/whiteline-group-ltd.jpeg
Whiteline Group Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Whiteline Group Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Project Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Whiteline Group Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Project Engineering company.

In the current year, Whiteline Group Ltd company and Project Engineering company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd company nor Project Engineering company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd company nor Project Engineering company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Whiteline Group Ltd company nor Project Engineering company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Project Engineering company nor Whiteline Group Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Project Engineering nor Whiteline Group Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Project Engineering company nor Whiteline Group Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Project Engineering company employs more people globally than Whiteline Group Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Project Engineering nor Whiteline Group Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Project Engineering nor Whiteline Group Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Project Engineering nor Whiteline Group Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Project Engineering nor Whiteline Group Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Project Engineering nor Whiteline Group Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Project Engineering nor Whiteline Group Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H