Comparison Overview

Progress Valley, Inc.

VS

Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI)

Progress Valley, Inc.

1100 East 80th Street, Bloomington, MN 55420, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.progressvalley.org

Progress Valley, Inc. is a nonprofit organization providing substance use and mental health treatment services for recovering adults. We provide integrated, comprehensive and gender specific programs with an emphasis on personal responsibility and a strong work ethic. The basic philosophy of Progress Valley is that personal responsibility is integral to recovery and the path to establishing a life-long foundation of positive self-esteem and human dignity. Our mission is to provide a continuum of recovery support services, which encourages and guides individuals to lead responsible, fulfilling, chemical-free lives.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI)

137 Hospital Drive, None, Fort Walton Beach, Florida, US, 32548
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 650 and 699
http://www.bridgewaycenter.org/

Through compassionate care and clinical excellence, Bridgeway Center Inc. (BCI) is dedicated to servicing the behavioral health needs of Okaloosa County residents. We are committed to the wellness of individuals, families, and the community through prevention, intervention, treatment, and support. We offer a full spectrum of outpatient services in a warm and inviting atmosphere.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/progress-valley-inc..jpeg
Progress Valley, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridgewaycenterinc.jpeg
Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Progress Valley, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Progress Valley, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) in 2026.

Incident History — Progress Valley, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progress Valley, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/progress-valley-inc..jpeg
Progress Valley, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bridgewaycenterinc.jpeg
Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI)
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Progress Valley, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Progress Valley, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company and Progress Valley, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company nor Progress Valley, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Progress Valley, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company nor Progress Valley, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Progress Valley, Inc. company nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Progress Valley, Inc. nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Progress Valley, Inc. company nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Progress Valley, Inc. company employs more people globally than Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Progress Valley, Inc. nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Progress Valley, Inc. nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Progress Valley, Inc. nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Progress Valley, Inc. nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Progress Valley, Inc. nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Progress Valley, Inc. nor Bridgeway Center, Inc. (BCI) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References