Comparison Overview

Progress Software

VS

Waystar

Progress Software

15 Wayside Rd, Burlington, Massachusetts, US, 01803
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 0 and 549

Progress Software (Nasdaq: PRGS) empowers organizations to achieve transformational success in the face of disruptive change. Our software enables our customers to develop,deploy and manage responsible AI-powered applications and digital experiences with agility and ease. Customers get a trusted provider in Progress, with the products, expertise and vision they need to succeed. Over 4 million developers and technologists at hundreds of thousands of enterprises depend on Progress. Learn more at www.progress.com.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 4,227
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Waystar

888 W Market St, Louisville, Kentucky, US, 40202
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 700 and 749

Waystar’s enterprise-grade software is purpose-built to simplify healthcare payments. We enable providers to prioritize patient care and optimize their financial performance. Waystar serves approximately 30,000 clients, representing over 1 million distinct providers, including 16 of 20 institutions on the U.S. News Best Hospitals Honor Roll. Waystar’s enterprise-grade platform annually processes over 5 billion healthcare payment transactions, including over $2.4 trillion in annual gross claims and spanning approximately 60% of U.S. patients. Waystar strives to transform healthcare payments so providers can put the human touch where it matters most: their patients and communities. Put simply, Waystar is the way to make healthcare payments more human with a software platform designed for providers + patients. Discover the way forward at waystar.com.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1,688
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/progress-software.jpeg
Progress Software
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/waystar.jpeg
Waystar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Progress Software
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Waystar
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Progress Software has 15.25% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Waystar in 2026.

Incident History — Progress Software (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progress Software cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Waystar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Waystar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/progress-software.jpeg
Progress Software
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-day vulnerability exploitation
Motivation: Data exfiltration, Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Software Vulnerability (MOVEit Platform), Unauthorized Access, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft for Dark Web Sale, Extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/waystar.jpeg
Waystar
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Coding Error
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Waystar company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Progress Software company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Progress Software company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Waystar company.

In the current year, Progress Software company has reported more cyber incidents than Waystar company.

Progress Software company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Waystar company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Waystar company and Progress Software company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Waystar company nor Progress Software company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Progress Software company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Waystar company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Progress Software nor Waystar holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Progress Software company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Waystar company.

Progress Software company employs more people globally than Waystar company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Progress Software nor Waystar holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Progress Software nor Waystar holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Progress Software nor Waystar holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Progress Software nor Waystar holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Progress Software nor Waystar holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Progress Software nor Waystar holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.