Comparison Overview

Progress

VS

PhonePe

Progress

15 Wayside Rd, Burlington, Massachusetts, US, 01803
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 0 and 549

Progress Software (Nasdaq: PRGS) empowers organizations to achieve transformational success in the face of disruptive change. Our software enables our customers to develop,deploy and manage responsible AI-powered applications and digital experiences with agility and ease. Customers get a trusted provider in Progress, with the products, expertise and vision they need to succeed. Over 4 million developers and technologists at hundreds of thousands of enterprises depend on Progress. Learn more at www.progress.com.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 3,843
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
4

PhonePe

Green Glen Layout Road, Bengaluru East, Karnataka, 560103, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

PhonePe Group is India’s leading fintech company, proudly recognized as India’s #1 Trusted Digital Payments* Brand for three consecutive years. Our flagship product, the PhonePe app was launched in August 2016, has rapidly become the preferred consumer payments app in India. In just eight years, PhonePe has gained over 57 crore + registered users and established a digital payments acceptance network of over 4 crore+ merchants spread across Tier 2,3 cites and beyond, covering 99% of the postal codes in the country. Building on our leadership in digital payments, PhonePe Group has expanded into financial services—including insurance, lending, and wealth management—along with new consumer tech ventures such as Pincode, a hyperlocal ecommerce platform, Indus App Store - India’s first localized app store, and Share.Market- A wealth and investment platform (app & website), catering to investors and traders needs. Headquartered in India, PhonePe Group aligns its diverse portfolio of businesses with our vision We're committed to empowering every Indian by unlocking the flow of money and providing equal access to easy & secure payments and financial services.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 15,345
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/progress-software.jpeg
Progress
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phonepe-internet.jpeg
PhonePe
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Progress
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PhonePe
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Progress in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PhonePe in 2025.

Incident History — Progress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PhonePe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PhonePe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/progress-software.jpeg
Progress
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Software Vulnerability (MOVEit Platform), Unauthorized Access, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft for Dark Web Sale, Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Vulnerability Exploitation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Vulnerability in MOVEit Software
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phonepe-internet.jpeg
PhonePe
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PhonePe company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Progress company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Progress company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PhonePe company has not reported any.

In the current year, PhonePe company and Progress company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Progress company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while PhonePe company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Progress company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other PhonePe company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Progress company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while PhonePe company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Progress company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while PhonePe company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Progress nor PhonePe holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Progress company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PhonePe company.

PhonePe company employs more people globally than Progress company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Progress nor PhonePe holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Progress nor PhonePe holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Progress nor PhonePe holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Progress nor PhonePe holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Progress nor PhonePe holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Progress nor PhonePe holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X