Comparison Overview

Progress Printing Plus

VS

Instant One Media

Progress Printing Plus

2677 Waterlick Rd, Lynchburg, VA, US, 24502
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Progress Printing is one of the most reliable and best-equipped commercial/catalog printers in the nation, with five acres of talent and technology, 250 team members and 800 premier customers in 40 states. Headquartered in Lynchburg, VA, Progress Printing is the largest private, independent commercial printer in Virginia and one of the 100 largest commercial printers in the U.S. Since 1962 our core values have been hard work, integrity, and craftsmanship blended with state-of-the-art technologies. We're large enough to have all the best equipment, but small enough for friendly personal service. We offer digital prepress, full web and sheetfed printing, bindery/finishing, packaging, mailing, and distribution services. We specialize in custom solutions for the sophisticated needs of premier customers. Our plant manufactures about 500 custom printing jobs a month, including catalogs, publications, periodicals, brochures, digital flip books, flyers, posters, folders, inserts, direct mail, books, annual reports, and other collateral.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Instant One Media

675 Metropolitan Ave, Atlanta, GEORGIA, 30310, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Instant One Media, a division of Appliance Art, was started to give printing companies a choice that doesn't involve digging through HUGE catalogs to know they are getting the lowest price. WE WERE PRINTERS! We know what you do on a daily basis. We know that 5%, 10%, 30% price reduction could KILL your bottom line. We also know that with the recession, loyalty went out the window. Customers want the best price at the fastest rate. Imagine bidding a product for 25% less than your competitor but walking away with the same profit? It is possible with Instant One Media. Why pay huge pricing for 3M when many materials will work on an indoor graphic that will just be torn down in 1, 2, or even 4 years? The customer can't tell the difference, the installer won't care, and in the end, who did it help to charge more for the graphic just to come home with the same profit? With Instant One Media, you can offer lower pricing to your customers and make more profit because that's what we're in business to do! Our parent company started printing a product for consumers and we got more and more momentum and national TV, Radio, and Media exposure. When we were printing roll after roll, 3M didn’t make sense, and then soon after, private label rolls didn't make sense either. So we took the top materials form all the Big Boys and went to the vinyl factory and told them we wanted: 1) air-release, 2) removability, 3) calendared, 4) 3 mil, 5) re-positionable, and 6) easy to work with heat and curves. After several attempts, we have locked in the vinyl we have in-house and we couldn't believe what the distributors were charging for the same thing! Why pay more for the same product? GRIMCO, Advantage Sign Supply, Agfa, Feller's, and many more companies are getting the EXACT same vinyl but charging 40-80% more! Don't pay more for the same thing!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/progress-printing-plus.jpeg
Progress Printing Plus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instant-one-media.jpeg
Instant One Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Progress Printing Plus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Instant One Media
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Progress Printing Plus in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Instant One Media in 2025.

Incident History — Progress Printing Plus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progress Printing Plus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Instant One Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Instant One Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/progress-printing-plus.jpeg
Progress Printing Plus
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instant-one-media.jpeg
Instant One Media
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Progress Printing Plus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Instant One Media company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Instant One Media company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Progress Printing Plus company.

In the current year, Instant One Media company and Progress Printing Plus company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Instant One Media company nor Progress Printing Plus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Instant One Media company nor Progress Printing Plus company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Instant One Media company nor Progress Printing Plus company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Progress Printing Plus company nor Instant One Media company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Progress Printing Plus nor Instant One Media holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Progress Printing Plus company nor Instant One Media company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Progress Printing Plus company employs more people globally than Instant One Media company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Progress Printing Plus nor Instant One Media holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Progress Printing Plus nor Instant One Media holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Progress Printing Plus nor Instant One Media holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Progress Printing Plus nor Instant One Media holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Progress Printing Plus nor Instant One Media holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Progress Printing Plus nor Instant One Media holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L