Comparison Overview

ProGraphics Communications

VS

Matrix Print & Design

ProGraphics Communications

5664 New Peachtree Road, Atlanta, 30341, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

ProGraphics is a total solution printing company that produces award winning printed collateral. We are a privately owned printing company, so we can do things that large, publicly owned printing companies simply can't. We are a full-service, one-stop provider for all your printing needs. From high-quality large-press work, to the latest in digital printing and finishing, to comprehensive direct mail programs, promotion and fulfillment services, whatever your printing needs, we can take care of them. ProGraphics offers a full line of printing services along with an unmatched level of responsiveness and flexibility. For more information and to see what solutions we can come up with for you, please visit http://www.PGC-ATL.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Matrix Print & Design

33 Queen Street, Barnstaple, Devon, EX32 8HG, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Matrix Print and Design are unique printers based in Barnstaple, North Devon offering the widest range of design and printing services in the south west. Set up in 1982 as a Prontaprint Barnstaple franchise the business was purchased by Managing Director Steve Evans in 1998. From a standard Photocopying shop the business has grown into a forward thinking dynamic Design and Printing operation offering the most up to date printing services. Our primary goal is customer satisfaction and many of our clients have been with us for the last 30 years because as their businesses have changed, so have we. In 2011 we overhauled our branding, dispatching the Prontaprint Barnstaple franchise and became Matrix Print & Design. In 2012 new larger premises were purchased to cope with an increase in business and a wider range of printing services. In 2013 our exciting new Price Guide including samples was launched, copies of which are available on request. In 2015 we expanded our range to include Banners which can be found at www.matrixbanners.com. Other than Steve the other members of staff have been part of the business for between 8 and 22 years. These include Liam who looks after Production and Sales, David is in charge of Graphic Design, Marianne is the Press Operator and Donna who looks after the marketing of the business.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prographics-communications.jpeg
ProGraphics Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/matrix-print-&-design.jpeg
Matrix Print & Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ProGraphics Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Matrix Print & Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ProGraphics Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Matrix Print & Design in 2025.

Incident History — ProGraphics Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ProGraphics Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Matrix Print & Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Matrix Print & Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prographics-communications.jpeg
ProGraphics Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/matrix-print-&-design.jpeg
Matrix Print & Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ProGraphics Communications company and Matrix Print & Design company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Matrix Print & Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ProGraphics Communications company.

In the current year, Matrix Print & Design company and ProGraphics Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Matrix Print & Design company nor ProGraphics Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Matrix Print & Design company nor ProGraphics Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Matrix Print & Design company nor ProGraphics Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ProGraphics Communications company nor Matrix Print & Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Matrix Print & Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ProGraphics Communications company nor Matrix Print & Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ProGraphics Communications company employs more people globally than Matrix Print & Design company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Matrix Print & Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Matrix Print & Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Matrix Print & Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Matrix Print & Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Matrix Print & Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Matrix Print & Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N