Comparison Overview

ProGraphics Communications

VS

Impression Label

ProGraphics Communications

5664 New Peachtree Road, Atlanta, 30341, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pgc-atl.com

ProGraphics is a total solution printing company that produces award winning printed collateral. We are a privately owned printing company, so we can do things that large, publicly owned printing companies simply can't. We are a full-service, one-stop provider for all your printing needs. From high-quality large-press work, to the latest in digital printing and finishing, to comprehensive direct mail programs, promotion and fulfillment services, whatever your printing needs, we can take care of them. ProGraphics offers a full line of printing services along with an unmatched level of responsiveness and flexibility. For more information and to see what solutions we can come up with for you, please visit http://www.PGC-ATL.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Impression Label

111 Inverness Dr E, Englewood, Colorado, 80112, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.impressionlabel.com/

Formerly Blair Labeling, Impression Label was created to emphasize the evolution and expansion of one of the industry-leading label printing companies. Impression Label is a full-service, pressure-sensitive label printing company that creates premium labels. We have been around for more than three decades, high standards for our equipment lines, and over 350 years of combined label printing experience. Our dedicated, enthusiastic team, is ready to help create your branding identity! Impression Label provides our clients with the best service, fast response and finish times, reliability, and most of all, the highest quality product label printing solutions. Impression Label manufactures and sells pressure-sensitive multicolored, prime, promotional, and industrial labels. We also have the capacity to print: decals, tamper evident constructions, thermals, patterns, tags, hangers, and card products. Adhesives for both hand and high-speed automatic applications are available for various temperatures, durability, and bonding needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prographics-communications.jpeg
ProGraphics Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blair-labeling-inc-.jpeg
Impression Label
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ProGraphics Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Impression Label
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ProGraphics Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Impression Label in 2025.

Incident History — ProGraphics Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ProGraphics Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Impression Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Impression Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prographics-communications.jpeg
ProGraphics Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blair-labeling-inc-.jpeg
Impression Label
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ProGraphics Communications company and Impression Label company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Impression Label company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ProGraphics Communications company.

In the current year, Impression Label company and ProGraphics Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Impression Label company nor ProGraphics Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Impression Label company nor ProGraphics Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Impression Label company nor ProGraphics Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ProGraphics Communications company nor Impression Label company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Impression Label holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ProGraphics Communications company nor Impression Label company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ProGraphics Communications company employs more people globally than Impression Label company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Impression Label holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Impression Label holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Impression Label holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Impression Label holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Impression Label holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ProGraphics Communications nor Impression Label holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References