Comparison Overview

Professional Sign Services

VS

iPhatt

Professional Sign Services

165 Hamm Road, Chattanooga, 37405, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Whether you are needing interior or exterior signage, standard displays or customized signs with challenging installations, you can depend on us to focus on your needs and produce the finest product. Our personnel and installers combine creativity and cutting-edge technology with time-tested craftsmanship to execute every project with expertise. Keeping with the changing times and to better serve our clients we have chosen to expand our services and include a wider range of products. To better reflect this change, we have changed our name from Graphic Works to Professional Sign Services and aligned ourselves with Certified Lighting - an industry leader in the production and installation of dimensional signage. If you can imagine it, we can create. Let us take your message to new heights.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

iPhatt

Loughborough, gb
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

My name is Matt Green and iPhatt is my Website Design Company & Online Portfolio based in Loughborough . I offer a range of services; logo design, website design, iphone repairs and mobile web design available to individuals across the globe and to existing or startup businesses. Initial websites design/ logo design meetings will cover your budget and timescale so I can cater to your requirements.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/professional-sign-services.jpeg
Professional Sign Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iphatt.jpeg
iPhatt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Professional Sign Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
iPhatt
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Professional Sign Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for iPhatt in 2025.

Incident History — Professional Sign Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Professional Sign Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — iPhatt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

iPhatt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/professional-sign-services.jpeg
Professional Sign Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iphatt.jpeg
iPhatt
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

iPhatt company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Professional Sign Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, iPhatt company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Professional Sign Services company.

In the current year, iPhatt company and Professional Sign Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither iPhatt company nor Professional Sign Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither iPhatt company nor Professional Sign Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither iPhatt company nor Professional Sign Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Professional Sign Services company nor iPhatt company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Professional Sign Services nor iPhatt holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Professional Sign Services company nor iPhatt company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Professional Sign Services company employs more people globally than iPhatt company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Professional Sign Services nor iPhatt holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Professional Sign Services nor iPhatt holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Professional Sign Services nor iPhatt holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Professional Sign Services nor iPhatt holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Professional Sign Services nor iPhatt holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Professional Sign Services nor iPhatt holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X