Comparison Overview

Professional Mail Services, Inc.

VS

Transaction Graphics

Professional Mail Services, Inc.

2012 TW Alexander Dr, Durham, North Carolina, 27703, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

Professional Mail Services, Inc. is a leading provider of traditional and electronic mail services. If you need to communicate with a customer, we have the expertise and solutions to maximize results...and budgets. From the most basic cost-effective processing of mail (we process millions of pieces per year) to the most personalized direct marketing programs or statement delivery we successfully unite you with your customers. Statement outsourcing customers come to Professional Mail Services, Inc. for our billing know-how and industry experience. Setup and implementation is fast, easy and hassle free. We offer professional one-on-one consultation and expert advice. We make the complete process painless and effective.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Transaction Graphics

1801 N Shelby Oaks Dr, Memphis, TN, 38134, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Transaction Graphics Inc. produces personal and business checks, payment coupons books, promotional checks, credit access documents, IRD stock, variable data statements, notices and direct marketing services to financial institutions as well as individual consumers and small businesses. The company is headquartered in Memphis, Tennessee and operates one of the industry's most modern printing facilities. Our Customer Service department utilizes state-of-the-art technology to optimize routing and handling of each inquiry or customer order. This combined with our high-speed digital print technology and mail services, enables TGI to deliver millions of checks monthly in an accurate and timely manner. TGI is dedicated to providing industry leading QUALITY, VALUE, and SERVICE.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/professional-mail-services-inc..jpeg
Professional Mail Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transaction-graphics.jpeg
Transaction Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Professional Mail Services, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transaction Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Professional Mail Services, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transaction Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Professional Mail Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Professional Mail Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transaction Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transaction Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/professional-mail-services-inc..jpeg
Professional Mail Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transaction-graphics.jpeg
Transaction Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Transaction Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Professional Mail Services, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Transaction Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Professional Mail Services, Inc. company.

In the current year, Transaction Graphics company and Professional Mail Services, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Transaction Graphics company nor Professional Mail Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Transaction Graphics company nor Professional Mail Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Transaction Graphics company nor Professional Mail Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. company nor Transaction Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Transaction Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. company nor Transaction Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Professional Mail Services, Inc. company employs more people globally than Transaction Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Transaction Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Transaction Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Transaction Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Transaction Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Transaction Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Transaction Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N