Comparison Overview

Professional Mail Services, Inc.

VS

Arkansas Graphics, Inc.

Professional Mail Services, Inc.

2012 TW Alexander Dr, Durham, North Carolina, 27703, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mailpros.com

Professional Mail Services, Inc. is a leading provider of traditional and electronic mail services. If you need to communicate with a customer, we have the expertise and solutions to maximize results...and budgets. From the most basic cost-effective processing of mail (we process millions of pieces per year) to the most personalized direct marketing programs or statement delivery we successfully unite you with your customers. Statement outsourcing customers come to Professional Mail Services, Inc. for our billing know-how and industry experience. Setup and implementation is fast, easy and hassle free. We offer professional one-on-one consultation and expert advice. We make the complete process painless and effective.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Arkansas Graphics, Inc.

800 S Gaines St, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799
http://arkansasgraphics.com

Arkansas Graphics, Inc., a customer-focused, technology-led commercial printing company based in Little Rock, Arkansas, has been in business for over 45 years. We have built a proud heritage on the core skills of a traditional commercial printing company, while staying on the cutting edge of new technologies and working practices. More than just a printing company; we offer many solutions to our customers that allow them to communicate effectively. Whether it is traditional litho printing, new digital variable printing, web-based communication, large display graphics or even Laser die cutting, we are here to serve you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/professional-mail-services-inc..jpeg
Professional Mail Services, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-graphics-inc.jpeg
Arkansas Graphics, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Professional Mail Services, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arkansas Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Professional Mail Services, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arkansas Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Professional Mail Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Professional Mail Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arkansas Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arkansas Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/professional-mail-services-inc..jpeg
Professional Mail Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-graphics-inc.jpeg
Arkansas Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Professional Mail Services, Inc. company and Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Professional Mail Services, Inc. company.

In the current year, Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company and Professional Mail Services, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company nor Professional Mail Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company nor Professional Mail Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company nor Professional Mail Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. company nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. company nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Arkansas Graphics, Inc. company employs more people globally than Professional Mail Services, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Professional Mail Services, Inc. nor Arkansas Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References