Comparison Overview

Produlith

VS

Midtown Printing & Graphics

Produlith

1439 Graham-Bell, Boucherville, Québec, J4B 6A1, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

As a company specializing in packaging, Produlith is distinguished by a unique combination of services including marketing strategy, design, development and manufacturing of paperboard packaging. We have the experience, standard operating processes and the latest technologies that best fit the needs of our clients. Cosmetic, speciality food, commercial, pharmaceutical or general, we master the challenges of your industry and propose packaging solutions that work for you and your products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Midtown Printing & Graphics

7720 University Ave, Lubbock, Texas, 79423, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Locally Owned & Operated The printing business is all about making impressions. Midtown Printing and Graphics, in Lubbock, TX makes them every day...on paper. At Midtown, we understand the power of print and the impact it can have on your bottom line. Printing is still the most cost effective form of advertising. Let us show you how a few good ideas can make a great lasting impression on your audience. Midtown Printing has been owned for over 20 years by State Representative John Frullo. He has served as the Representative for District 84 since 2010. As an active community member and strong business leader, John leads Midtown Printing with a focus on quality, craft, and overall good business ethics.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/produlith.jpeg
Produlith
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/midtown-printing-and-graphics.jpeg
Midtown Printing & Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Produlith
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Midtown Printing & Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Produlith in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Midtown Printing & Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Produlith (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Produlith cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Midtown Printing & Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Midtown Printing & Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/produlith.jpeg
Produlith
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/midtown-printing-and-graphics.jpeg
Midtown Printing & Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Midtown Printing & Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Produlith company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Midtown Printing & Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Produlith company.

In the current year, Midtown Printing & Graphics company and Produlith company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Midtown Printing & Graphics company nor Produlith company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Midtown Printing & Graphics company nor Produlith company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Midtown Printing & Graphics company nor Produlith company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Produlith company nor Midtown Printing & Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Produlith nor Midtown Printing & Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Produlith company nor Midtown Printing & Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Produlith company employs more people globally than Midtown Printing & Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Produlith nor Midtown Printing & Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Produlith nor Midtown Printing & Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Produlith nor Midtown Printing & Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Produlith nor Midtown Printing & Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Produlith nor Midtown Printing & Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Produlith nor Midtown Printing & Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L