Comparison Overview

Productivity Commission

VS

Gezinsbond

Productivity Commission

697 Collins St, Docklands, 3008, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

The Productivity Commission is an independent research and advisory agency for the Australian Government. While the government largely determines our work program, our findings and recommendations are independent and based on our own analysis and judgment. Not only do we look at economic issues, but social and environmental issues too. Our research and policy advice can help governments improve or create better policies to benefit all Australians. Our main role is to conduct public inquiries and studies into current issues. For example our inquiry into disability support was used in creating the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Our projects provide opportunities for different points of view to be heard and considered. Participation in our inquiries or Commissioned studies is encouraged and gives you the opportunity to have a say in Australia’s public policy formation. You can participate by making a submission to us, it’s open to everyone. Submissions could be a short email or letter outlining your views or a much more substantial document. Providing evidence such as documentation, data or research to support your viewpoint is always useful. Often after we release a draft report, we hold hearings that are open to the public. Anyone can participate whether it be elaborating on their submission or simply providing relevant information to the Commissioners. Whether you want to speak at a hearing or just observe, you will be able to book a spot via our website. The Commission also undertakes additional research. Some of this research supports our inquiries as well as helping outline future directions for reform. You can find out more about us and our current projects by heading to our website, pc.gov.au

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 187
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gezinsbond

Arduinkaai 16, Brussel, 1000, BE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

De Gezinsbond is de grootste onafhankelijke gezinsorganisatie van het land. We verdedigen de belangen van álle gezinnen in Vlaanderen en Brussel. Los van religieuze, ideologische of politieke opvattingen. En ongeacht de samenstelling van de gezinnen. Het belang van de kinderen staat altijd voorop. We zijn er voor kleine en grote gezinnen, jonge en oude gezinnen, tweeouder- en eenoudergezinnen, traditionele en nieuw samengestelde gezinnen, voor ouders en grootouders, voor pleeg- of adoptieouders en mantelzorgers ... We staan gezinnen bij met raad en advies op maat. Met activiteiten die gezinnen bij elkaar brengen. Met voordelen en kortingen. En we voeren voor en achter de schermen elke dag weer strijd voor een gezins- en kindvriendelijke samenleving. We kunnen daarvoor rekenen op de steun van 10.000 vrijwilligers, 100 personeelsleden en ruim 130.000 leden-gezinnen. ONZE DROOM De Gezinsbond werkt aan een gezins- en kindvriendelijke samenleving waar iedereen zich thuis voelt en zijn stem kan laten horen, los van zijn achtergrond en familiale situatie. We bouwen mee aan een Vlaanderen waar iedereen maximale ontplooiingskansen krijgt en elkaar helpt. We geloven dat gezinnen de basis zijn van een hechte samenleving, dat leden en vrijwilligers een onmisbare kracht zijn om onze missie te realiseren. WAT WE BELOVEN De Gezinsbond is dé partner voor elk gezin in alle levensfasen. We brengen gezinnen samen, versterken hen en komen op voor een gezins- en kindvriendelijke samenleving. ONZE WAARDEN De Gezinsbond is onafhankelijk, vooruitdenkend, inclusief, solidair en verbindend. WAT WE DOEN De Gezinsbond behartigt belangen, informeert, ondersteunt, verbindt, biedt voordelen en diensten aan, is een aanspreekpunt en wegwijzer.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 241
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/productivity-commission.jpeg
Productivity Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gezinsbond-vzw.jpeg
Gezinsbond
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Productivity Commission
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gezinsbond
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Productivity Commission in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gezinsbond in 2025.

Incident History — Productivity Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Productivity Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gezinsbond (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gezinsbond cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/productivity-commission.jpeg
Productivity Commission
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gezinsbond-vzw.jpeg
Gezinsbond
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gezinsbond company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Productivity Commission company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gezinsbond company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Productivity Commission company.

In the current year, Gezinsbond company and Productivity Commission company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gezinsbond company nor Productivity Commission company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gezinsbond company nor Productivity Commission company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gezinsbond company nor Productivity Commission company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Productivity Commission company nor Gezinsbond company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Productivity Commission nor Gezinsbond holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Productivity Commission company nor Gezinsbond company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gezinsbond company employs more people globally than Productivity Commission company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Productivity Commission nor Gezinsbond holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Productivity Commission nor Gezinsbond holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Productivity Commission nor Gezinsbond holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Productivity Commission nor Gezinsbond holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Productivity Commission nor Gezinsbond holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Productivity Commission nor Gezinsbond holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H