Proctor School District
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 700 and 749
None
NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Comparison Overview
Proctor School District
VS
University of Sydney
University of Sydney
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 800 and 849
As the first university to be established in Australasia, the University of Sydney consistently ranks as one of Australia’s top universities. We aim to create and sustain a university that will, for the benefit of both Australia and the wider world, maximise the potential of the brightest researchers and most promising students, whatever their social or cultural background. Web: sydney.edu.au Explore Sydney through the eyes of a student in 360° on our Virtual Tour: sydney.edu.au/tour Twitter: twitter.com/Sydney_Uni Facebook: facebook.com/sydneyuni Instagram: @sydney_uni YouTube: youtube.com/uniofsydney CRICOS: 00026A TEQSA: PRV12057
NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 18,522
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Proctor School District
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
University of Sydney
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Proctor School District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Sydney
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Proctor School District in 2025.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Sydney in 2025.
Incident History — Proctor School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Proctor School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — University of Sydney (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Sydney cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
Proctor School District
Incidents
Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malicious Software
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
University of Sydney
Incidents
No Incident
FAQ
University of Sydney company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Proctor School District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
Proctor School District company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Sydney company has not reported any.
In the current year, University of Sydney company and Proctor School District company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Proctor School District company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while University of Sydney company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither University of Sydney company nor Proctor School District company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.
Neither University of Sydney company nor Proctor School District company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.
Neither Proctor School District company nor University of Sydney company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Sydney holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
University of Sydney company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Proctor School District company.
University of Sydney company employs more people globally than Proctor School District company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Sydney holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Sydney holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Sydney holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Sydney holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Sydney holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Sydney holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /contact_us.php. This manipulation of the argument Name causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
C-Kermit (aka ckermit) through 10.0 Beta.12 (aka 416-beta12) before 244644d allows a remote Kermit system to overwrite files on the local system, or retrieve arbitrary files from the local system.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
Telenium Online Web Application is vulnerable due to a Perl script that is called to load the login page. Due to improper input validation, an attacker can inject arbitrary Perl code through a crafted HTTP request, leading to remote code execution on the server.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Fujitsu / Fsas Technologies ETERNUS SF ACM/SC/Express (DX / AF Management Software) before 16.8-16.9.1 PA 2025-12, when collected maintenance data is accessible by a principal/authority other than ETERNUS SF Admin, allows an attacker to potentially affect system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description
ONLYOFFICE Docs before 9.2.1 allows XSS in the textarea of the comment editing form. This is related to DocumentServer.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
