Proctor School District
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 700 and 749
None
NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Comparison Overview
Proctor School District
VS
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 800 and 849
The University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign is dedicated to building upon its tradition of excellence in education, research, public engagement and economic development. More than 3,000 faculty members discover and create new knowledge. Their work is an economic engine for the state and is recognized with many of the world’s top academic and creative awards. The campus’ outstanding academic programs, extraordinary resources and bountiful opportunities attract top-caliber students. They join research teams, spend semesters abroad, create art in old and new ways and lead and participate in hundreds of student organizations. The Urbana campus has more than 425,000 alumni who are global leaders across the spectrum of human endeavor.
NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 21,797
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Proctor School District
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Proctor School District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Proctor School District in 2025.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in 2025.
Incident History — Proctor School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Proctor School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
Proctor School District
Incidents
Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malicious Software
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Incidents
No Incident
FAQ
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Proctor School District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
Proctor School District company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company has not reported any.
In the current year, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company and Proctor School District company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Proctor School District company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company nor Proctor School District company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.
Neither University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company nor Proctor School District company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.
Neither Proctor School District company nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Proctor School District company.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign company employs more people globally than Proctor School District company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Proctor School District nor University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /contact_us.php. This manipulation of the argument Name causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
C-Kermit (aka ckermit) through 10.0 Beta.12 (aka 416-beta12) before 244644d allows a remote Kermit system to overwrite files on the local system, or retrieve arbitrary files from the local system.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
Telenium Online Web Application is vulnerable due to a Perl script that is called to load the login page. Due to improper input validation, an attacker can inject arbitrary Perl code through a crafted HTTP request, leading to remote code execution on the server.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Fujitsu / Fsas Technologies ETERNUS SF ACM/SC/Express (DX / AF Management Software) before 16.8-16.9.1 PA 2025-12, when collected maintenance data is accessible by a principal/authority other than ETERNUS SF Admin, allows an attacker to potentially affect system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description
ONLYOFFICE Docs before 9.2.1 allows XSS in the textarea of the comment editing form. This is related to DocumentServer.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
