Comparison Overview

Proctor School District

VS

Rutgers University

Proctor School District

None
Last Update: 2025-12-25

None

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Rutgers University

57 US Highway 1, New Brunswick, NJ, US, 08901
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, stands among America’s highest-ranked, most diverse public research universities. The oldest, largest, and top-ranked public university in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area, you’ll find us at our main locations in three New Jersey cities, and our footprint can be seen around the region. We’re an academic, health, and research powerhouse and a university of opportunity.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 18,207
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Proctor School District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rutgersu.jpeg
Rutgers University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Proctor School District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rutgers University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Proctor School District in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rutgers University in 2025.

Incident History — Proctor School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Proctor School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rutgers University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rutgers University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Proctor School District
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malicious Software
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rutgersu.jpeg
Rutgers University
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2018
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Rutgers University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Proctor School District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Proctor School District and Rutgers University have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Rutgers University company and Proctor School District company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Proctor School District company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Rutgers University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Rutgers University company nor Proctor School District company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rutgers University company nor Proctor School District company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Proctor School District company nor Rutgers University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Proctor School District nor Rutgers University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rutgers University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Proctor School District company.

Rutgers University company employs more people globally than Proctor School District company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Proctor School District nor Rutgers University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Proctor School District nor Rutgers University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Proctor School District nor Rutgers University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Proctor School District nor Rutgers University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Proctor School District nor Rutgers University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Proctor School District nor Rutgers University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /contact_us.php. This manipulation of the argument Name causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

C-Kermit (aka ckermit) through 10.0 Beta.12 (aka 416-beta12) before 244644d allows a remote Kermit system to overwrite files on the local system, or retrieve arbitrary files from the local system.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Telenium Online Web Application is vulnerable due to a Perl script that is called to load the login page. Due to improper input validation, an attacker can inject arbitrary Perl code through a crafted HTTP request, leading to remote code execution on the server.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fujitsu / Fsas Technologies ETERNUS SF ACM/SC/Express (DX / AF Management Software) before 16.8-16.9.1 PA 2025-12, when collected maintenance data is accessible by a principal/authority other than ETERNUS SF Admin, allows an attacker to potentially affect system confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

ONLYOFFICE Docs before 9.2.1 allows XSS in the textarea of the comment editing form. This is related to DocumentServer.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N