Comparison Overview

Procter & Gamble India

VS

A. O. Smith Corporation

Procter & Gamble India

Procter & Gamble Plaza, Mumbai, 400099, IN
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

P&G was founded over 180 years ago as a soap and candle company. In India, P&G’s history started in 1985 with the acquisition of Richardson Hindustan Limited (RHL). Today we touch the lives of hundreds of millions of consumers in India with our portfolio of 13 leading and trusted brands including Ambi Pur®, Ariel®, Gillette®, Head & Shoulders®, Herbal Essences®, Olay®, Old Spice®, Oral-B®, Pampers®, Pantene®, SK-II®, Tide®, Vicks®, and Whisper®. Our purpose is to improve consumers’ lives in small but meaningful ways, and it inspires our people to make a positive contribution every day. We are committed to stepping up as a #ForceForGood and have embedded citizenship into the way we do business. We are serving our communities, focusing on building a more equal and inclusive world and protecting our planet.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

A. O. Smith Corporation

11270 W. Park Place, Milwaukee, WI, US, 53224
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799

Celebrating its 150th year of business, A. O. Smith is a leading global water technology and manufacturing company that proudly employs more than 12,000 people who together provide water heating and water treatment solutions. The company is headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with operations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, China, India, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The company also has sales and distribution in more than 60 countries around the world. As a global water technology leader, A. O. Smith applies innovative technology and energy-efficient solutions to products marketed worldwide. Our focus is on building this platform through new product development, global expansion, strategic acquisitions and partnerships.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 13,956
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/procter-gamble-india.jpeg
Procter & Gamble India
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-o-smith-corporation.jpeg
A. O. Smith Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Procter & Gamble India
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A. O. Smith Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Procter & Gamble India in 2026.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A. O. Smith Corporation in 2026.

Incident History — Procter & Gamble India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Procter & Gamble India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A. O. Smith Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A. O. Smith Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/procter-gamble-india.jpeg
Procter & Gamble India
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-o-smith-corporation.jpeg
A. O. Smith Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

A. O. Smith Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Procter & Gamble India company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, A. O. Smith Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Procter & Gamble India company.

In the current year, A. O. Smith Corporation company and Procter & Gamble India company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation company nor Procter & Gamble India company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation company nor Procter & Gamble India company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation company nor Procter & Gamble India company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Procter & Gamble India company nor A. O. Smith Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Procter & Gamble India nor A. O. Smith Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Procter & Gamble India company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to A. O. Smith Corporation company.

A. O. Smith Corporation company employs more people globally than Procter & Gamble India company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Procter & Gamble India nor A. O. Smith Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Procter & Gamble India nor A. O. Smith Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Procter & Gamble India nor A. O. Smith Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Procter & Gamble India nor A. O. Smith Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Procter & Gamble India nor A. O. Smith Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Procter & Gamble India nor A. O. Smith Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H