Comparison Overview

Procter & Gamble

VS

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Procter & Gamble

2 P&G Plaza, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

P&G was founded more than 185 years ago as a soap and candle company. Today, we’re one of the world’s largest consumer goods companies and home to iconic, trusted brands, including Always®, Charmin®, Braun®, Fairy®, Febreze®, Gillette®, Head & Shoulders®, Oral B®, Pantene®, Pampers®, Tide®, and Vicks®. The design, development, growth and success of these products—and many more—is thanks to the innovative and insightful minds of our people. From Day 1, you’ll help make everyday life easier for our 5 billion consumers. There is no single equation for success at P&G, because no two P&G people or careers are alike. Just as we strive to deliver a superior consumer experience, we aim to deliver a superior employee value equation as well. With our large global footprint, there are many opportunities to work with P&G in multiple locations. We offer opportunities in approximately 70 countries and continually aim to attract, reward and advance the finest people in the world. Here, we want you to get your career off to a fast start. That's why we don't have any rotational development programs or gradual ramping-up periods: you’ll be able—and encouraged—to dive right in from Day 1. Join us and help make life better through meaningful work that makes an impact from Day 1.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 91,835
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Pirojshanagar, Vikhroli, Mumbai, Maharastra, IN, 400079
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Godrej is one of India’s most trusted brands serving over 1.1bn customers worldwide, every day. Godrej & Boyce, a Godrej group company, began it's journey in 1897 with the manufacture of high quality locks and continues with its outstanding engineering capabilities across diverse categories – from consumer goods and furniture, precision manufacturing and aerospace, infrastructure development, and industrial logistics to real estate and power distribution. At Godrej, we enable you to do work that’s good for you, your customers, your community and good for the people around you - essentially, work that you can be proud of.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 19,009
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/procter-and-gamble.jpeg
Procter & Gamble
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/godrej.jpeg
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Procter & Gamble
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Procter & Gamble in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. in 2025.

Incident History — Procter & Gamble (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Procter & Gamble cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/procter-and-gamble.jpeg
Procter & Gamble
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/godrej.jpeg
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Procter & Gamble company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Procter & Gamble company.

In the current year, Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company and Procter & Gamble company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company nor Procter & Gamble company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company nor Procter & Gamble company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company nor Procter & Gamble company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Procter & Gamble company nor Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Procter & Gamble nor Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Procter & Gamble company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company.

Procter & Gamble company employs more people globally than Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Procter & Gamble nor Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Procter & Gamble nor Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Procter & Gamble nor Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Procter & Gamble nor Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Procter & Gamble nor Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Procter & Gamble nor Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H