Comparison Overview

ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)

VS

Red Hat

ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)

13450 W Sunrise Blvd, Sunrise, Florida, 33323, US
Last Update: 2025-05-03 (UTC)

ProcessMAP was acquired by Ideagen in 2022. Ideagen EHS (formerly known as ProcessMAP) is a unified environmental, health and safety solution that provides real-time visibility into risk and safety metrics across your entire workforce. Improve your safety culture, simplify OSHA and RIDDOR reporting and streamline inspections, audits, activities and so much more, all in one system.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 205
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Red Hat

100 E. Davie St., Raleigh, NC, 27601, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Red Hat is the worldโ€™s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, hybrid cloud, edge, and Kubernetes technologies. We hire creative, passionate people who are ready to contribute their ideas, help solve complex problems, and make an impact. Opportunities are open. Join us.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 19,575
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/processmap-corporation.jpeg
ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-hat.jpeg
Red Hat
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Red Hat
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Red Hat has 104.08% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Red Hat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Hat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/processmap-corporation.jpeg
ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-hat.jpeg
Red Hat
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company and Red Hat company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Red Hat company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Red Hat company has reported more cyber incidents than ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company.

Neither Red Hat company nor ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Red Hat company nor ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Red Hat company nor ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Red Hat company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Red Hat company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company.

Red Hat company employs more people globally than ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.