Comparison Overview

ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)

VS

Juniper Networks

ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)

13450 W Sunrise Blvd, Sunrise, Florida, 33323, US
Last Update: 2025-05-03 (UTC)

ProcessMAP was acquired by Ideagen in 2022. Ideagen EHS (formerly known as ProcessMAP) is a unified environmental, health and safety solution that provides real-time visibility into risk and safety metrics across your entire workforce. Improve your safety culture, simplify OSHA and RIDDOR reporting and streamline inspections, audits, activities and so much more, all in one system.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 205
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Juniper Networks

1133 Innovation Way, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Juniper Networks is leading the revolution in networking, making it one of the most exciting technology companies in Silicon Valley today. Since being founded by Pradeep Sindhu, Dennis Ferguson, and Bjorn Liencres nearly 20 years ago, Juniperโ€™s sole mission has been to create innovative products and solutions that meet the growing demands of the connected world. Juniper Networks [NYSE: JNPR] is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, with over 9,000 employees in 50 countries and nearly $5 billion in revenue. Our customers include the top 100 global service providers and 30,000 enterprises, including the Global Fortune 100 as well as hundreds of federal, state and local government agencies and higher educational organizations. At Juniper Networks, we believe the network is the single greatest vehicle for knowledge, understanding, and human advancement that the world has ever known. Now more than ever, the world needs network innovation to connect ideas and unleash our full potential. Juniper is taking a new approach to the network โ€” one that is intelligent, agile, secure and open to any vendor and any network environment. To learn more about Juniper, our products, and our vision for the decade ahead, visit our site at https://www.juniper.net.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 11,851
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/processmap-corporation.jpeg
ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/juniper-networks.jpeg
Juniper Networks
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Juniper Networks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Juniper Networks has 308.16% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Juniper Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Juniper Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/processmap-corporation.jpeg
ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/juniper-networks.jpeg
Juniper Networks
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Custom Backdoors
Motivation: Espionage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Custom Backdoors
Motivation: Long-term persistence and stealth
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access and Remote Command Execution
Motivation: DDoS Attacks
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company and Juniper Networks company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Juniper Networks company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Juniper Networks company has reported more cyber incidents than ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company.

Juniper Networks company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Juniper Networks company has disclosed at least one data breach, while ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Juniper Networks company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Juniper Networks company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Juniper Networks company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company.

Juniper Networks company employs more people globally than ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.