Comparison Overview

ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)

VS

Google

ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)

13450 W Sunrise Blvd, Sunrise, Florida, 33323, US
Last Update: 2025-05-03 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
https://www.ideagen.com/solutions/environmental-health-and-safety/ehs

Strong

ProcessMAP was acquired by Ideagen in 2022. Ideagen EHS (formerly known as ProcessMAP) is a unified environmental, health and safety solution that provides real-time visibility into risk and safety metrics across your entire workforce. Improve your safety culture, simplify OSHA and RIDDOR reporting and streamline inspections, audits, activities and so much more, all in one system.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 205
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Google

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, None, Mountain View, CA, US, 94043
Last Update: 2025-08-10 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
https://goo.gle/3DLEokh

A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that makes you unique. Together, we can build for everyone. Check out our career opportunities at goo.gle/3DLEokh

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 314,945
Subsidiaries: 52
12-month incidents
15
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/processmap-corporation.jpeg
ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/google.jpeg
Google
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Google
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Google has 2961.22% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Google (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Google cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/processmap-corporation.jpeg
ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/google.jpeg
Google
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email Spoofing, Messaging Platform (WhatsApp)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Fraudulent Services/Products) or Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Memory Allocator Manipulation, Heap Spraying, Dangling Pointer Dereference, Function Pointer Overwrite, Virtual Function Table Corruption, Race Conditions in Multithreaded Code, Callback-Based Object Lifetime Exploitation, JavaScript Engine Manipulation (e.g., Chrome FileReader), Pointer Authentication Bypass
Motivation: Arbitrary Code Execution, Privilege Escalation, Data Corruption, Bypassing Security Mitigations (DEP, ASLR, CFI), Exploit Development for Malware Distribution, Targeted Attacks on Browsers/OS/Critical Infrastructure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability in the Linux HFSC queuing discipline
Motivation: Security Research and Bounty
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company and Google company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Google company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Google company has reported more cyber incidents than ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company.

Google company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has disclosed at least one data breach, while ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company.

Google company employs more people globally than ProcessMAP (now Ideagen EHS) company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References