Comparison Overview

ProcessFlo, Inc.

VS

Team Corporation

ProcessFlo, Inc.

115 Hilton Street West, Easton, 18042, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

ProcessFlo is a full service distributor and representative of premiere pump manufacturers with a mission to be your long term business partner. We value our customer relationships and have close working ties with the manufacturers we represent, allowing us to keep you ahead of your competitors by providing solutions that make you money. With our diverse product offering, we are able to engineer a custom solution that reduces costs and/or increases your top line revenue. Our product line is designed and manufactured for both general and specialized applications found in a wide variety of industries, including: - Biotech - Chemical - Environmentla - Flavors & Fragrances - Food & Beverage - Metal Finishing - Mining - Oil & Gas - Paints & Pigments - Personal Care - Pharmaceutical - Power Genereation - Pulp & Paper - Semiconductor - Waste & Water Treatment - and many more ... Once you have entrusted us with your business, we are committed to servicing you with our entire professional sales staff.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Team Corporation

11591 Watertank Rd., Burlington, Washington, 98233, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Team Corporation designs, builds and delivers high-performance single and multi-axis vibration and shock test systems – as well as related components. The advent of vibration technology has resulted in the steady improvement in product quality, reliability, passenger comfort, and public safety. Vibration testing has become indispensable in assuring product quality, and Team Corporation, the pioneer and quality leader in this exacting field, has become the most trusted name in vibration testing. Since 1954, Team Corporation has contributed to the development of the world’s most advanced space, automotive, rail transportation, electronics, defense, packaging, telecommunications, seismic and oil exploration programs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/processflo-inc-.jpeg
ProcessFlo, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/team-corporation.jpeg
Team Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ProcessFlo, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Team Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ProcessFlo, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Team Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — ProcessFlo, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ProcessFlo, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Team Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Team Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/processflo-inc-.jpeg
ProcessFlo, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/team-corporation.jpeg
Team Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ProcessFlo, Inc. company and Team Corporation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Team Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ProcessFlo, Inc. company.

In the current year, Team Corporation company and ProcessFlo, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Team Corporation company nor ProcessFlo, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Team Corporation company nor ProcessFlo, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Team Corporation company nor ProcessFlo, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ProcessFlo, Inc. company nor Team Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ProcessFlo, Inc. nor Team Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ProcessFlo, Inc. company nor Team Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Team Corporation company employs more people globally than ProcessFlo, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither ProcessFlo, Inc. nor Team Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ProcessFlo, Inc. nor Team Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ProcessFlo, Inc. nor Team Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ProcessFlo, Inc. nor Team Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ProcessFlo, Inc. nor Team Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ProcessFlo, Inc. nor Team Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H