Comparison Overview

Probiblio

VS

Library of Parliament

Probiblio

Spicalaan 55, Hoofddorp, 2132, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Probiblio is de ondernemende en betrouwbare partner voor bibliotheken in Noord- en Zuid-Holland. Bibliotheken kunnen bij ons terecht voor ondersteuning en advies bij hun bedrijfsvoering. Of het nu gaat om digitalisering, het personeel, marketing, of om de collectie of programma's voor mediawijsheid en educatie. Omdat de bibliotheekbranche volop in beweging is, bewegen wij mee. De komende tijd groeit Probiblio door naar een ondernemende en innovatieve kennis- en netwerkpartner. Wil jij daaraan bijdragen?

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Library of Parliament

Parliament of Canada, None, Ottawa, Ontario, CA, K1A 0A9
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Library of Parliament is the Parliament of Canada’s knowledge centre. We provide parliamentarians and their staff with impartial reference, research and analysis services, reliable news from around the globe, and access to our extensive collection of resources. Our educational programming and resources also help Canadians experience and learn about Parliament. Find out more about us at lop.parl.ca. --- La Bibliothèque du Parlement est le centre de connaissances du Parlement du Canada. Elle offre aux parlementaires et à leur personnel des services objectifs de référence, de recherche et d’analyse, des sources fiables de nouvelles et du monde entier, ainsi que l’accès à sa vaste collection. Ses programmes et ressources pédagogiques viennent également en aide à la population canadienne afin de lui permettre de mieux connaître le Parlement. Pour en savoir plus, consultez le bdp.parl.ca.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 424
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/probiblio.jpeg
Probiblio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/library-of-parliament.jpeg
Library of Parliament
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Probiblio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Library of Parliament
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Probiblio in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Library of Parliament in 2025.

Incident History — Probiblio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Probiblio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Library of Parliament (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Library of Parliament cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/probiblio.jpeg
Probiblio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/library-of-parliament.jpeg
Library of Parliament
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Library of Parliament company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Probiblio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Library of Parliament company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Probiblio company.

In the current year, Library of Parliament company and Probiblio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Library of Parliament company nor Probiblio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Library of Parliament company nor Probiblio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Library of Parliament company nor Probiblio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Probiblio company nor Library of Parliament company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Probiblio nor Library of Parliament holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Probiblio company nor Library of Parliament company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Library of Parliament company employs more people globally than Probiblio company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Probiblio nor Library of Parliament holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Probiblio nor Library of Parliament holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Probiblio nor Library of Parliament holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Probiblio nor Library of Parliament holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Probiblio nor Library of Parliament holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Probiblio nor Library of Parliament holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H