Comparison Overview

Pro Facto

VS

Patent Services USA INC

Pro Facto

Ossenmarkt 5, Groningen, 9712NZ, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Pro Facto is een bureau voor praktijkgericht bestuurskundig en juridisch onderzoek, advies en onderwijs. Meer informatie over onze kernproducten vindt u hieronder. We zijn geworteld in het noorden maar landelijk actief. Onze opdrachtgevers zijn vrijwel uitsluitend overheden. We vervullen geen opdrachten voor particulieren. Rekenkameronderzoek We zijn gespecialiseerd in rekenkameronderzoek. Op maat gesneden, uitgewerkte offertes, gedegen praktijkgericht onderzoek en heldere rapportages zijn daarbij kernwoorden. Juridisch advies Pro Facto verzorgt onder meer secretariaten van bezwaarschriftencommissies, geeft juridisch advies in concrete zaken en doet aan juridische kwaliteitszorg. Onderzoek We hebben ruime ervaring met het uitvoeren van allerlei vormen van onderzoek. Naast rekenkameronderzoek maken we onderscheid tussen bestuurskundig en bestuursjuridisch onderzoek. Opleidingen Over diverse onderwerpen bieden wij cursussen en opleidingen aan, zowel in-company als met open inschrijving. Kijk voor meer informatie op www.pro-facto.nl

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Patent Services USA INC

28 W Flagler Street, North Miami, FL, 33130, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At Patent Services USA, we are dedicated to supporting inventors at every step of their journey. Our network of independent professionals is committed to helping you research, develop, protect, and bring your inventions to the market. By harnessing our collective purchasing power, we negotiate competitive rates for our clients. With our knowledgeable consultants by your side, you can confidently navigate the intricate process of patenting your intellectual property and transforming your inventions into successful products.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pro-facto.jpeg
Pro Facto
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patent-services-usa.jpeg
Patent Services USA INC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pro Facto
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Patent Services USA INC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pro Facto in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patent Services USA INC in 2025.

Incident History — Pro Facto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pro Facto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Patent Services USA INC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patent Services USA INC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pro-facto.jpeg
Pro Facto
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patent-services-usa.jpeg
Patent Services USA INC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Patent Services USA INC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pro Facto company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Patent Services USA INC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pro Facto company.

In the current year, Patent Services USA INC company and Pro Facto company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Patent Services USA INC company nor Pro Facto company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Patent Services USA INC company nor Pro Facto company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Patent Services USA INC company nor Pro Facto company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pro Facto company nor Patent Services USA INC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pro Facto nor Patent Services USA INC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pro Facto company nor Patent Services USA INC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Patent Services USA INC company employs more people globally than Pro Facto company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Pro Facto nor Patent Services USA INC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pro Facto nor Patent Services USA INC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pro Facto nor Patent Services USA INC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pro Facto nor Patent Services USA INC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pro Facto nor Patent Services USA INC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pro Facto nor Patent Services USA INC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X