Comparison Overview

Pro Copy

VS

Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern

Pro Copy

8710 F Street, Omaha, NE, 68127, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Pro Copy is a specialty document services company helping companies make the most of their limited resources with: - Litigation Support, assisting attorneys and paralegals by simplifying document discovery or duplication - Reprographics, providing large-format print and distribution services for architects, engineers and contractors - Document Archival, streamlining and protecting companies' valuable document assets - Photo Archival, moving personal memories from photos to digital files, protecting them for the future and making them available for today's world Give us a call, and let's talk about what Pro Copy can do for you!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern

1401 17th Street, Denver, 80202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

RUEGSEGGER SIMONS SMITH & STERN, LLC is dedicated to advising and representing employers and insurers in workers’ compensation and employment matters, and in other areas of civil litigation. We take pride in helping clients accomplish their objectives while minimizing legal risks. Working closely with our clients, we develop legal strategies appropriate to their needs. We give clients the attention they deserve and we keep them informed. Our attorneys have over one hundred years of combined legal experience in workers’ compensation, employment law and complex civil litigation. As a result, our clients benefit daily from our expertise. We have offices in Denver, Denver Tech Center, Colorado Springs, Broomfield, and Grand Junction.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pro-copy.jpeg
Pro Copy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pro Copy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pro Copy in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern in 2025.

Incident History — Pro Copy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pro Copy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pro-copy.jpeg
Pro Copy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pro Copy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pro Copy company.

In the current year, Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern company and Pro Copy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern company nor Pro Copy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern company nor Pro Copy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern company nor Pro Copy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pro Copy company nor Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pro Copy nor Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pro Copy company nor Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern company employs more people globally than Pro Copy company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Pro Copy nor Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pro Copy nor Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pro Copy nor Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pro Copy nor Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pro Copy nor Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pro Copy nor Ruegsegger Simons Smith & Stern holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X