Comparison Overview

Pro-Bind

VS

Snyder Printer

Pro-Bind

undefined, undefined, undefined, 66051, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pro-bind.com/

Pro-Bind is a national manufacturer of thermal binding covers, photo books, two piece cover sets, presentation folders, loose-leaf binders, index tabs, presentation packaging and thermal binding equipment. Our full service capabilities include foil stamping, embossing, silk-screening, spot-color offset printing as well as four-color process offset or digital printing. Pro-Bind began in 2007 to fill a need in the market to domestically manufacture quality thermal products at affordable prices within a reasonable time frame. With over 100 years of combined experience, Pro-Bind is an industry leader in superior products, exceptional service and expertise. Pro-Bind is the next generation of thermal binding and presentation products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Snyder Printer

691 River Street, Troy, NY, 12180, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.snyderprinter.com/

Snyder Printer Inc. was established in 1895 with the goal of providing excellent print quality, hassle-free customer service and very competitive pricing for all of our customers. We are experts in our field and have a proven track record at helping companies large and small to produce high quality collateral pieces that are not only aesthetically pleasing but also highly functional and affordable representations of your business. Producing superb printing requires the best from each member of our team. From our sales associates to our delivery drivers, we have a dedicated staff of professionals who love what they do…and it shows in all that we do. Investing in the latest technologies throughout our plant is crucial for us. We update our equipment often, always looking for safer, more efficient ways to bring projects to life. Heidelberg presses fill our pressroom, and our bindery was upgraded in 2008 with the addition of a new Heidelberg ST-350 saddlestitcher. Be it one color or multiple colors, we can bring your message to life. The staccato screening process ensures that every printed piece is of the highest quality. Couple that with our commitment to customer satisfaction, and you can truly see the difference between Snyder Printer and other merchants. We are your number one solution for offset commercial printing in Upstate New York and surrounding areas. Call us today to discuss your project and a free estimate.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pro-bind.jpeg
Pro-Bind
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snyder-printer.jpeg
Snyder Printer
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pro-Bind
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Snyder Printer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pro-Bind in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Snyder Printer in 2025.

Incident History — Pro-Bind (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pro-Bind cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Snyder Printer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Snyder Printer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pro-bind.jpeg
Pro-Bind
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snyder-printer.jpeg
Snyder Printer
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Snyder Printer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pro-Bind company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Snyder Printer company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pro-Bind company.

In the current year, Snyder Printer company and Pro-Bind company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Snyder Printer company nor Pro-Bind company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Snyder Printer company nor Pro-Bind company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Snyder Printer company nor Pro-Bind company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pro-Bind company nor Snyder Printer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pro-Bind nor Snyder Printer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Pro-Bind company nor Snyder Printer company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Snyder Printer company employs more people globally than Pro-Bind company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Pro-Bind nor Snyder Printer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pro-Bind nor Snyder Printer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pro-Bind nor Snyder Printer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pro-Bind nor Snyder Printer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pro-Bind nor Snyder Printer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pro-Bind nor Snyder Printer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References