Comparison Overview

Private Practice, New York

VS

LAE-LAH Inc.

Private Practice, New York

10001, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 800 and 849

I am a clinical psychologist in private practice. I also work as a supervising psychologist at the Pace University Counseling Center. In addition to helping you with your immediate problems, our work together will focus on facilitating positive change. I will help you develop a better understanding of yourself, with the goal of making lasting emotional and behavioral change. I am trained in psychodynamic/psychoanalytic psychotherapy. I am also trained in Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), which focuses on helping clients regulate emotions, tolerate distress, develop mindfulness skills, and enjoy more effective interpersonal relationships. I also specialize in helping people who have dropped out of previous therapy. I am committed to working in a muticultural and LGBTQ affirming therapy environment. Please contact me to arrange for a consultation. (347) 878-9980. Office in Chelsea.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LAE-LAH Inc.

undefined, Orlando, Florida , undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Specializing in helping people help themselves and heal through Christ! LAE-LAH Inc is a firm where we listen and embrace. Lend An Ear, Lend A Hug is a name given to me by God, whereby, He wants His people to feel heard and accepted. A wide array of services are available. As an LPC, services include workshops, seminars, ways to master stress, professional development, trainings, etc. Additionally, book publications help our clientele delve deeper into becoming wholesome individuals and/or companies. Please visit www.lashawnlewis.com.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Private Practice, New York
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lae-lah-consulting-inc-.jpeg
LAE-LAH Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Private Practice, New York
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LAE-LAH Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Private Practice, New York in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LAE-LAH Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Private Practice, New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Private Practice, New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LAE-LAH Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LAE-LAH Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Private Practice, New York
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lae-lah-consulting-inc-.jpeg
LAE-LAH Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Private Practice, New York company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LAE-LAH Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LAE-LAH Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Private Practice, New York company.

In the current year, LAE-LAH Inc. company and Private Practice, New York company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LAE-LAH Inc. company nor Private Practice, New York company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LAE-LAH Inc. company nor Private Practice, New York company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LAE-LAH Inc. company nor Private Practice, New York company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Private Practice, New York company nor LAE-LAH Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Private Practice, New York nor LAE-LAH Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

LAE-LAH Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Private Practice, New York company.

Private Practice, New York company employs more people globally than LAE-LAH Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Private Practice, New York nor LAE-LAH Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Private Practice, New York nor LAE-LAH Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Private Practice, New York nor LAE-LAH Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Private Practice, New York nor LAE-LAH Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Private Practice, New York nor LAE-LAH Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Private Practice, New York nor LAE-LAH Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N