Comparison Overview

Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision

VS

Alabama Psychological Services Center

Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision

91203, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 800 and 849

My career as a Psychologist spans 25 + years that includes teaching, supervision, and psychotherapy. In my psychotherapy practice I work with adults, couples, and older adolescents in short and long term psychotherapy. I have experience working with a wide range of clients representing varied ages, occupations, life styles, races, and cultures. I have multiple areas of focus including: anxiety, depression, work stress, relationship conflict, low self-esteem, alcohol and drug abuse, loss, critical illness, and trauma. It is my belief that self-examination, the willingness to face emotional difficulties, is fundamental to effective coping and living a full and gratifying life. My goal in therapy is to create a safe place where you will feel supported to do the challenging work of self-exploration that leads to emotional and behavioral change. I am committed to working collaboratively, which means I am flexible, interactive, and attentive to your specific needs.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 191
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alabama Psychological Services Center

4800 Whitesport Circle, Huntsville, 35801, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1991, Alabama Psychological Services Center provides comprehensive mental health services in a caring and professional setting in a convenient location for residents of Huntsville and North Alabama. Excellent care is available for children, adolescents, adults, and older individuals as well as families and couples. In addition, a wide range of psychotherapy, social skills training, and support groups are offered. The practice is owned by Dr. Lois Pope and is staffed by well-trained and highly experienced psychologists, licensed professional counselors, and licensed clinical social workers. The clinicians at Alabama Psychological Services Center work together in a multidisciplinary team approach in order to provide the highest quality of care possible. In addition, the providers in the practice collaborate with professionals in the community whenever appropriate. Alabama Psychological Services Center maintains relationships with psychiatric hospitals and university medical centers, primary care physicians, medical specialists, mental health providers, schools, and allied health professionals in the community. Providers in the practice participate in various insurance plans, and office staff will assist patients seeking reimbursement from their health insurance companies. Furthermore, 24-hour emergency assistance is available through our on-call system. Non-emergency calls are routinely answered within one to two business days. At Alabama Psychological Services Center, we understand how challenging coping with mental illness can be. That is why we strive to provide the highest quality of care in a warm, friendly, and accessible setting.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alabama-psychological-services-center.jpeg
Alabama Psychological Services Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alabama Psychological Services Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alabama Psychological Services Center in 2026.

Incident History — Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alabama Psychological Services Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alabama Psychological Services Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alabama-psychological-services-center.jpeg
Alabama Psychological Services Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alabama Psychological Services Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alabama Psychological Services Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision company.

In the current year, Alabama Psychological Services Center company and Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alabama Psychological Services Center company nor Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alabama Psychological Services Center company nor Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alabama Psychological Services Center company nor Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision company nor Alabama Psychological Services Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision nor Alabama Psychological Services Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision company nor Alabama Psychological Services Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision company employs more people globally than Alabama Psychological Services Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision nor Alabama Psychological Services Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision nor Alabama Psychological Services Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision nor Alabama Psychological Services Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision nor Alabama Psychological Services Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision nor Alabama Psychological Services Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Private Practice - Psychotherapy & Supervision nor Alabama Psychological Services Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N