Comparison Overview

PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen

VS

Universität Duisburg-Essen

PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen

Weender Landstraße 3-7, Göttingen, undefined, 37073, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 800 and 849

Die staatlich anerkannte PFH ist eine private Hochschule, die das unternehmerische Denken in den Mittelpunkt stellt. Sie bietet derzeit 55 Campus- und Fernstudiengänge in Management, Technologie, Healthcare Technology, Business Law, Wirtschaftsinformatik sowie Psychologie und Wirtschaftspsychologie an. Campusorte sind Göttingen und der Hansecampus, darüber hinaus gibt es 24 Fernstudienzentren in Deutschland, Österreich und auf Mallorca. Die PFH wurde 1995 in Göttingen gegründet. Sie hat sich der Ausbildung von qualifiziertem Führungskräftenachwuchs in den Bereichen Management und Technologie verschrieben, um einen Beitrag zur Wettbewerbssicherung Deutschlands als Wissenschafts- und Wirtschaftsstandort zu leisten. Diesem Anspruch wird die Hochschule durch konsequente Praxisorientierung und Entwicklung innovativer Lehrangebote gerecht. Impressum/Imprint: https://www.pfh.de/ueber-uns/impressum.html

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 244
Subsidiaries: 53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Universität Duisburg-Essen

Forsthausweg 2, Duisburg, Nordrhein-Westfalen, 47057, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799

Das LinkedIn-Profil aus der und rund um die Universität Duisburg-Essen Zu allen Links: https://uni-due.online/links/ Impressum: https://www.uni-due.de/de/impressum.shtml Netiquette: https.//www.uni-due.de/de/socialmedia/netiquette.php Offen im Denken: Inmitten der dichtesten Hochschullandschaft Europas liegt die Universität Duisburg-Essen (UDE). 2003 durch die Fusion der Gesamthochschulen in Duisburg und Essen entstanden, gehört die jüngste Universität Nordrhein-Westfalens zu den zehn größten in Deutschland. Beide Campi sind gut zu erreichen und bieten ein breites, international ausgerichtetes Fächerspektrum - von den Geistes- und Gesellschaftswissenschaften über die Wirtschaftswissenschaften bis hin zu den Ingenieur- und Naturwissenschaften einschließlich der Medizin. Hier lernen Studierende aus 130 Nationen. Die UDE gehört in vielen Disziplinen zu den TOP 10 der forschungsstärksten deutschen Universitäten. In den vergangenen drei Jahren sind die Forschungseinnahmen um 150 Prozent gestiegen. Dafür sorgen auch die Profilschwerpunkte: Nanowissenschaften, Biomedizinische Wissenschaften, Urbane Systeme sowie Wandel von Gegenwartsgesellschaften.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3,542
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/private-fachhochschule-g-ttingen.jpeg
PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-duisburg-essen.jpeg
Universität Duisburg-Essen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Universität Duisburg-Essen
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hochschulen und Universitäten Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen in 2025.

Incidents vs Hochschulen und Universitäten Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universität Duisburg-Essen in 2025.

Incident History — PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Universität Duisburg-Essen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universität Duisburg-Essen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/private-fachhochschule-g-ttingen.jpeg
PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-duisburg-essen.jpeg
Universität Duisburg-Essen
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Universität Duisburg-Essen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Universität Duisburg-Essen company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen company.

In the current year, Universität Duisburg-Essen company and PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Universität Duisburg-Essen company nor PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Universität Duisburg-Essen company nor PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Universität Duisburg-Essen company nor PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen company nor Universität Duisburg-Essen company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen nor Universität Duisburg-Essen holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Universität Duisburg-Essen company.

Universität Duisburg-Essen company employs more people globally than PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen company, reflecting its scale as a Hochschulen und Universitäten.

Neither PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen nor Universität Duisburg-Essen holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen nor Universität Duisburg-Essen holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen nor Universität Duisburg-Essen holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen nor Universität Duisburg-Essen holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen nor Universität Duisburg-Essen holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen nor Universität Duisburg-Essen holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L