Comparison Overview

Pritchard Industries

VS

Mitie

Pritchard Industries

150 E 42nd St, New York, NY, 10017, US
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)

Excellent

Driven by a singular vision, it is our mission to provide unparalleled excellence in building services with an emphasis on quality, integrity & innovation. Our team is as diverse as our services. Our ability to adapt to different environments & meet varied client needs is the key factor to our longstanding success. Our facility services redefine industry standards & foster a sustainable, socially responsible environment. We are dedicated to employee growth, client satisfaction & community advancement. Our services enhance the functionality, safety & aesthetics of your environment. Your needs are our priority & we offer an extensive array of facility solutions designed to cater to your distinct requirements. Whether you're a corporate entity, an educational institution, a healthcare provider, or manage any other type of facility, we have the resources & dedication to deliver your desired outcomes.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 647
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mitie

The Shard, Level 12, 32 London Bridge Street, London, UK, SE1 9SG, GB
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Founded in 1987, Mitie is the UKโ€™s leading facilities management and professional services company. We offer a range of specialist services including Security, Engineering Services, Cleaning, Landscaping, Energy and Property Consultancy, Property Maintenance, and Custody Support Services. Mitie employs 77,500 people across the country, looking after a large, diverse, blue-chip customer base, from banks and retailers, to hospitals, schools and government offices. We take care of our customersโ€™ people and buildings, by delivering the basics brilliantly and by deploying advanced technology. We are pioneers in the Connected Workspace, using smart analytics to provide valuable insight and deliver efficiencies to create outstanding work environments for customers.

NAICS: 5612
NAICS Definition: Facilities Support Services
Employees: 17,395
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pritchardindustries.jpeg
Pritchard Industries
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitie.jpeg
Mitie
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Pritchard Industries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mitie
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pritchard Industries in 2025.

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitie in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Pritchard Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pritchard Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Mitie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pritchardindustries.jpeg
Pritchard Industries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitie.jpeg
Mitie
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Pritchard Industries company and Mitie company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Mitie company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Pritchard Industries company.

In the current year, Mitie company and Pritchard Industries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mitie company nor Pritchard Industries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mitie company nor Pritchard Industries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mitie company nor Pritchard Industries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pritchard Industries company nor Mitie company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Mitie company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pritchard Industries company.

Mitie company employs more people globally than Pritchard Industries company, reflecting its scale as a Facilities Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.